2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstetric violence: a new framework for identifying challenges to maternal healthcare in Argentina

Abstract: Argentina has recognized women's right to not be subjected to obstetric violence, the violence exercised by health personnel on the body and reproductive processes of pregnant women, as expressed through dehumanizing treatment, medicalization abuse, and the conversion of natural processes of reproduction into pathological ones. Argentina's legislative decision to frame this abuse and mistreatment of women under the rubric of gender-based violence permits the identification of failures in both the healthcare sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
16

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
50
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Another challenge is establishing criteria for different forms of mistreatment that allow for the comparison of mistreatment between study sites, while also capturing the nuances of mistreatment unique to each location and study population. Critics have noted that the Bowser and Hill definitions and Latin American obstetric violence laws do not sufficiently specify what acts constitute abusive care [ 3 , 27 ]. Without specific typology included in the category definitions, researchers using the disrespect and abuse categories have used different criteria and study methodologies to determine what constitutes physical abuse or non-dignified care, for example, and thus the comparability of studies has been limited [ 3 ].…”
Section: Terminology and Definitions Of Mistreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another challenge is establishing criteria for different forms of mistreatment that allow for the comparison of mistreatment between study sites, while also capturing the nuances of mistreatment unique to each location and study population. Critics have noted that the Bowser and Hill definitions and Latin American obstetric violence laws do not sufficiently specify what acts constitute abusive care [ 3 , 27 ]. Without specific typology included in the category definitions, researchers using the disrespect and abuse categories have used different criteria and study methodologies to determine what constitutes physical abuse or non-dignified care, for example, and thus the comparability of studies has been limited [ 3 ].…”
Section: Terminology and Definitions Of Mistreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In a study on humanized delivery, only 48% of women chose the delivery position, but this number is still negligible , considering the autonomy of the woman. 15 In the study presented here, the largest portion of deliveries occurred in the dorsal decubitus, which again demonstrates a failure in care, since, according to the Ministry of Health, the recommendation of vertical positions during labor assists in the descent of the baby and consequent progression of labor. It is notorious, in this sense, that there is a lack of orientation and clarification of these women.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Participants also conceptualized buena atención (good attention) through a medicalized perspective, in which standards for quality care depended on perceptions of timeliness and effectiveness of service delivery, rather than on factors such as privacy or the demeanor of medical personnel. These findings are shared with various research studies throughout the world that have documented cases in which different forms of mistreatment become normalized to the extent that women or health providers do not view these as abusive (Castro and Erviti 2003;Grigoryan et al 2015;McMahon et al 2014). To our knowledge, Freedman and colleagues have proposed the only framework that accounts for deviations between researchers' definitions of mistreatment and women and medical personnel's perspectives of those issues (Freedman et al 2014;Freedman and Kruk 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%