2022
DOI: 10.1177/01945998221120777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Abstract: Objectives To evaluate the associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on SNHL. Data Sources Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases. Review Methods A systematic search was done for studies investigating relationships between OSA and SNHL in adults, with manual searches for additional references. The final update was done on December 22, 2021. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 11 reviews (64.71%) reported personal characteristics associated with discrimination at baseline (all relating to age) [38–41, 43, 44, 47, 49, 51–53], and three reviews (17.65%) reported data relating to personal characteristics associated with discrimination in the analysis of results (including one review which reported disability and two which reported age) (see Table 3) [38, 50, 53]. Less than half of SRs reported the gender of participants at baseline ( n = 7, 41.18%) [38, 40, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51], and two reported data relating to the gender of participants in the analysis of results (11.76%) (see Table 3) [38, 53]. Occupation was reported at baseline and in the analysis of results in three reviews (17.65%) [38, 51, 53].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A total of 11 reviews (64.71%) reported personal characteristics associated with discrimination at baseline (all relating to age) [38–41, 43, 44, 47, 49, 51–53], and three reviews (17.65%) reported data relating to personal characteristics associated with discrimination in the analysis of results (including one review which reported disability and two which reported age) (see Table 3) [38, 50, 53]. Less than half of SRs reported the gender of participants at baseline ( n = 7, 41.18%) [38, 40, 41, 43, 47, 49, 51], and two reported data relating to the gender of participants in the analysis of results (11.76%) (see Table 3) [38, 53]. Occupation was reported at baseline and in the analysis of results in three reviews (17.65%) [38, 51, 53].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 64 SRs included in Briscoe et al [35], 17 met the inclusion criteria for this secondary analysis (see Table 2) [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Of these, seven were published in 2021, and 10 were published in 2022.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A few prior studies have investigated the potential role of treatment for sleep disorders such as OSA on hearing and tinnitus. A meta‐analyses of 20 cohort, case‐control, and cross‐sectional studies that diagnosed OSA by polysomnography or sleep tests and hearing threshold level totaling 33,391 adult patients found that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for OSA did not show improvement in audiometry‐measured hearing loss 54 . In contrast, a prior non‐randomized, noncontrolled study assessing the impact of CPAP treatment on tinnitus found that the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores significantly decreased with CPAP use after 3 months for 14 patients with sleep‐disorder breathing and tinnitus symptoms 55 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%