OBT+stat

Johannessen, Janne Bondi; Hagen, Kristin; Lynum, André; Nøklestad, Anders

doi:10.1075/scl.49.03joh

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The other purpose of this annotation is to inform the other tool used to analyze the speeches so that it can be configured correctly. This tool, the Oslo-Bergen Tagger (OBT), annotates text with sentence and token boundaries, lemmas, parts of speech (PoS), and morphological features (Johannessen et al 2012).…”

Section: The Talk Of Norway Data Setmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Talk of Norway: a richly annotated corpus of the Norwegian parliament, 1998–2016

Lapponi

Søyland

Velldal

et al. 2018

Lang Resources & Evaluation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work we present the Talk of Norway (ToN) data set, a collection of Norwegian Parliament speeches from 1998 to 2016. Every speech is richly annotated with metadata harvested from different sources, and augmented with language type, sentence, token, lemma, part-of-speech, and morphological feature annotations. We also present a pilot study on party classification in the Norwegian Parliament, carried out in the context of a cross-faculty collaboration involving researchers from both Political Science and Computer Science. Our initial experiments demonstrate how the linguistic and institutional annotations in ToN can be used to gather insights on how different aspects of the political process affect classification.

show abstract

Section: The Talk Of Norway Data Setmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Talk of Norway: a richly annotated corpus of the Norwegian parliament, 1998–2016

Lapponi

Søyland

Velldal

et al. 2018

Lang Resources & Evaluation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…See https://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/english/services/knowledge-resources/omc/sub-corpora/.6 The English texts were tagged with the TreeTagger (www.cis.uni-muenchen.de/~schmid/tools/TreeTagger/) and the Norwegian texts with the Oslo Bergen Tagger(Johannessen et al, 2012).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lexicogrammar through colligation: Noun + Preposition in English and Norwegian

Hasselgård¹

2021

BeLLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study compares sequences of noun and preposition in English and Norwegian using data from the English-Norwegian Parallel Corpus. One purpose is to test the use of sequences of part-of-speech tags as a search method for contrastive studies. The other is to investigate the functions and meanings of prepositional phrases in the position after a noun across the two languages. The comparison of original texts shows that the function of postmodifier is most frequent in both languages, with adverbial in second place. Other functions are rare. English has more postmodifiers and fewer adverbials than Norwegian. Furthermore, the prepositional phrases express locative meaning, in both functions, more frequently in Norwegian than in English. The study of translations reveals that the adverbials have congruent correspondences more often than postmodifiers, particularly in translations from English into Norwegian.

show abstract

When complementation gets specific: A study of collocational preferences in verb–object combinations in Norwegian

Haugen

2020

Nord J Linguist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates to what extent there are collocational preferences in the verb–object combinations of a large corpus of Norwegian and how important recurrent combinations are in usage. The material has been extracted from a large web-corpus of 700 million tokens and consists of dependency-based verb–object combinations. The overall importance of collocational preferences is demonstrated by the fact that the most frequent 5% of the verb–object combinations account for as much as 64% of the verb–object tokens in the material. The database of verb–object combinations contains measures of collocational strength and thereby allows us to model the mutual strength between the exemplars in the clusters found with individual verbs. Based on some studies of individual verbs and verb pairs, it seems safe to assume that speakers do distinguish between and prefer certain conventional verb–object combinations to other equally grammatical, equally transparent and equally understandable alternatives, and that speakers have access to complementation information at the level of exemplars.

show abstract

OBT+stat

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

The Talk of Norway: a richly annotated corpus of the Norwegian parliament, 1998–2016

The Talk of Norway: a richly annotated corpus of the Norwegian parliament, 1998–2016

Lexicogrammar through colligation: Noun + Preposition in English and Norwegian

When complementation gets specific: A study of collocational preferences in verb–object combinations in Norwegian

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About