2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2002.tb00173.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obtaining Accurate Growth Measurements in Children

Abstract: Ask the Expert provides research‐based answers to practice questions submitted by JSPN readers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings indicate that WLH could be considered a reliable method to monitor growth in infants and young children and also suggest that LH-adjusted weight may be a more reliable index than age-adjusted weight when comparing national data with international standards. As shown in Figure 2, the WLH values for Turkish children were found to be comparable to World Health Organization references (14,15). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings indicate that WLH could be considered a reliable method to monitor growth in infants and young children and also suggest that LH-adjusted weight may be a more reliable index than age-adjusted weight when comparing national data with international standards. As shown in Figure 2, the WLH values for Turkish children were found to be comparable to World Health Organization references (14,15). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…1 cm intervals). Cross-sectional study design may also be considered as a limitation since serial measurements over a period of time would allow more precise results in the assessment of growth (14). However, since the difference in weight for each 5-cm interval is about 1.5 kg, we consider that a 5-cm range would not result in a significant deviation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%