2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obtaining sensitive information from a wary population: A comparison of telephone and face-to-face surveys of welfare recipients in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our survey, there was a higher proportion of nonemployed and more educated subjects, in accordance to previous reports regarding telephone respondents (Ford 1998;Galan et al 2004;Pridemore et al 2005;Weeks et al 1983). This may contribute to explain the lower proportion of smokers that we found among men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our survey, there was a higher proportion of nonemployed and more educated subjects, in accordance to previous reports regarding telephone respondents (Ford 1998;Galan et al 2004;Pridemore et al 2005;Weeks et al 1983). This may contribute to explain the lower proportion of smokers that we found among men.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Second, the setting (hospital vs. home) and the mode of data collection (faceto-face interview vs. telephone) varied between baseline and follow-up assessments. This may have influenced patients' responses [38]. For instance responses to face-toface interviews can be more affected by social desirability than responses to telephone interviews [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Privacy concerns can bias responding when sensitive or socially undesirable information is gathered (Aquilino, 1992;Johnson et al, 1989;Pridemore et al, 2005;Turner et al, 1995). A response bias may occur in community recruitment of adolescent marijuana users if only those adolescents whose parents are aware of their drug use are willing to respond to advertisements for study participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%