Gastroenterology Service Free Papers 2017
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314472.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OC-020 Validation of the utility of a faecal immunochemical testfor haemoglobin (fit) in patients presenting to primary care with new bowel symptoms

Abstract: IntroductionSymptoms alone are poor predictors of underlying colonic pathology.1 Yield of significant bowel disease (SBD), [colorectal cancer (CRC), high risk adenoma (HRA, defined as ≥3 or any ≥1 cm) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)] is low in patients referred for colonoscopy from primary care at 14%.2 We have shown that undetectable Faecal Haemoglobin (fHb) as measured by a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a good rule-out test for SBD.2,3 We introduced FIT tests to primary care in NHS Tayside from 7t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 5365 colorectal referrals from primary care with a completed FIT were available over the 29 month data collection period. Of these, 115 FIT samples were rejected (2.1%) for technical reasons, similar to previously published results [21]. Of the remaining 5250 patients, the median age was 62 years (range 16–96 years) and 2403 were male (45.7%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 5365 colorectal referrals from primary care with a completed FIT were available over the 29 month data collection period. Of these, 115 FIT samples were rejected (2.1%) for technical reasons, similar to previously published results [21]. Of the remaining 5250 patients, the median age was 62 years (range 16–96 years) and 2403 were male (45.7%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Of these, 115 FIT samples were rejected (2.1%) for technical reasons, similar to previously published results [21]. Of the remaining 5250 patients, the median age was 62 years (range 16-96 years) and 2403 were male (45.7%).…”
Section: Re Sultssupporting
confidence: 75%