2019
DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omz029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occam’s razor versus Hickam’s dictum: two very rare tumours in one single patient

Abstract: Occam's razor, the principle that a single explanation is the most likely in medicine, assumes that when a patient has multiple symptoms the clinician seeks a single diagnosis rather than diagnosing multiple and different ones. However, as proposed by Hickam’s dictum, sometimes rare different diseases occurred in only one patient. We present a patient with a simultaneous diagnosis of two rare tumours, a cardiac hemangioma (primary cardiac tumour, often misdiagnosed as myxoma) and an appendiceal muco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more thorough assessment and consecutive treatment also considers the other 90% of the iceberg. Such has been stated well by Hickam: "A man can have as many diseases as he damn well pleases" 33 .…”
Section: Therapeutical Outlookmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A more thorough assessment and consecutive treatment also considers the other 90% of the iceberg. Such has been stated well by Hickam: "A man can have as many diseases as he damn well pleases" 33 .…”
Section: Therapeutical Outlookmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This brings us to the question of Occam's razor which teaches us to associate seemingly unrelated signs versus Hickam's dictum which proclaims that a single person can have different unrelated diseases independently. [ 4 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Sox, Higgins, and Owens (2013) point out that having two common diseases can be more probable than having a single but rare disease. Marta Freixa et al (2019) go one step further by describing a case of two rare diseases occurring in a patient, which they consider to be in violation of diagnostic parsimony.…”
Section: Further Challenges To Diagnostic Parsimonymentioning
confidence: 99%