2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale

Abstract: Due to lack of the periodontal ligament, osseointegrated implants, unlike natural teeth, react biomechanically in a different fashion to occlusal force. It is therefore believed that dental implants may be more prone to occlusal overloading, which is often regarded as one of the potential causes for peri-implant bone loss and failure of the implant/implant prosthesis. Overloading factors that may negatively influence on implant longevity include large cantilevers, parafunctions, improper occlusal designs, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
357
2
40

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 494 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
10
357
2
40
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of scarce scientiic evidence, a number of factors give support to the biomechanical integrity of the single implant-supported prosthesis with cantilever springs: in the anterior maxilla, masticatory load is less than half of that found in the posterior maxilla; 24 implants currently available present a higher percentage of bone-to-implant contact, which is likely to increase anchorage; 25 careful occlusal adjustment 26 providing mild torque in intercuspal contact position, adequate protrusion and lateral guidance movements, especially at the implant abutment; and patient selection excluding those with parafunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of scarce scientiic evidence, a number of factors give support to the biomechanical integrity of the single implant-supported prosthesis with cantilever springs: in the anterior maxilla, masticatory load is less than half of that found in the posterior maxilla; 24 implants currently available present a higher percentage of bone-to-implant contact, which is likely to increase anchorage; 25 careful occlusal adjustment 26 providing mild torque in intercuspal contact position, adequate protrusion and lateral guidance movements, especially at the implant abutment; and patient selection excluding those with parafunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with constricted edentulous maxillae pose multiple challenges because the occlusion of these patients falls into cross bite which could result in occlusal interferences and overloading of implant leading to failure 4,7 . Occlusal overload results in crestal bone loss, thus increasing the anaerobic sulcus depth and predisposes the fixture towards progressive peri-implantitis and eventual loss of implant 8,9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, some principles of occlusion have been suggested as factors to consider when the occlusion of implant-supported dentures is established, such as the occlusal morphology of the denture orienting the occlusal force in the apical direction, reduced occlusal table, reduced inclination of the cusp, and reduced mesio-distal and vestibularlingual distance of the cantilever 21 . In order to establish an ideal occlusion in implant-supported dentures, prosthetic/surgical planning based on biomechanical principles is necessary 21 . Therefore treatment with implants greatly improves masticatory function and patient satisfaction for a long period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%