1985
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9993(85)90148-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occult head injury: Its incidence in spinal cord injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was estimated that 12% to 15% of deaths at the time of admission to hospital were associated with SCI. 19,20 Gennarelli et al reported that the mortality rate was 18.2% after head trauma and 60% of deaths in their trauma center was due to head trauma. 21 Considering that motor vehicle accidents and falls are the leading causes of traumatic SCI, we conclude that the prevention measures should be focused mainly on these types of traumas in order to reduce the frequency of SCI in Turkey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was estimated that 12% to 15% of deaths at the time of admission to hospital were associated with SCI. 19,20 Gennarelli et al reported that the mortality rate was 18.2% after head trauma and 60% of deaths in their trauma center was due to head trauma. 21 Considering that motor vehicle accidents and falls are the leading causes of traumatic SCI, we conclude that the prevention measures should be focused mainly on these types of traumas in order to reduce the frequency of SCI in Turkey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was estimated that 12 ± 15% of deaths at the time of admission to hospital were associated with SCI 13,14 : mainly due to head and brain injury, followed by cardiopulmonary problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All included studies reported the prevalence of concomitant cranio-spinal injury in the general adult trauma population irrespective of patient outcome. For example, studies investigating the prevalence of concomitant cranio-spinal injury in a rehabilitation population were excluded [3,4,26,36,46], as patients who died or were lost to follow-up would not be included in the prevalence estimated. Similarly, studies investigating prevalence of concomitant cranio-spinal injury in an autopsy population were excluded as they would not include patients who had survived [17,31,43].…”
Section: Impact Of Methodology On Prevalence Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%