2015
DOI: 10.1643/ce-14-116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupancy and Abundance Modeling of the Endangered Yellowcheek Darter in Arkansas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundulus olivaceus , S. atromaculatus and E. claviformis were sampled from six drainages (BP, BB, PG, PR, BL and LR), E. artesiae was sampled from BP and BB, E. whipplei was sampled from MW and LR, and E. parvipinne was sampled from PG and PR (Table ). Two of the drainages have large dams and reservoirs on the mainstem (PR: Ross Barnett, 1963, 134 km 2 ; LR: Greers Ferry Lake, 1964, 164 km 2 ) and were used for analyses investigating effects of impoundment (Figure ) (De Lanois & Green, ; Magoulick & Lynch, ; Zhang & Liu, ). For each drainage and species, we collected fin tissue from 15 individuals in six populations broadly located throughout each drainage (24 species–drainage combinations ×6 populations ×15 individuals =2,160 total; Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundulus olivaceus , S. atromaculatus and E. claviformis were sampled from six drainages (BP, BB, PG, PR, BL and LR), E. artesiae was sampled from BP and BB, E. whipplei was sampled from MW and LR, and E. parvipinne was sampled from PG and PR (Table ). Two of the drainages have large dams and reservoirs on the mainstem (PR: Ross Barnett, 1963, 134 km 2 ; LR: Greers Ferry Lake, 1964, 164 km 2 ) and were used for analyses investigating effects of impoundment (Figure ) (De Lanois & Green, ; Magoulick & Lynch, ; Zhang & Liu, ). For each drainage and species, we collected fin tissue from 15 individuals in six populations broadly located throughout each drainage (24 species–drainage combinations ×6 populations ×15 individuals =2,160 total; Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural streamflow regimes are threatened worldwide by a host of anthropogenic factors, including construction of dams and diversion structures, groundwater withdrawals from aquifers, and other hydromorphological alterations (Sondergaard and Jeppesen, 2007;Carlisle et al, 2010). Additionally, extreme climate events are expected to increase as a result of global climatic change, including many events that directly impact lotic ecosystems, such as increases in drought frequency, duration, and intensity in many regions of the world (Beniston et al, 2007;Beche et al, 2009), including in the focal region of this study, where these phenomena have already had consequences for rare and imperiled aquatic species (Magoulick and Lynch, 2015). The potential interactive effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors such as drought, climate change, and human water use on ecosystems highlight the need for increased understanding of each stressor (Christensen et al, 2006;Beche et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Headwaters sometimes provide the last refuge for species threatened by loss of habitat elsewhere in the watershed. Examples include the federally endangered Yellowcheek Darter Etheostoma moorei (endemic to the Boston Mountains of Arkansas; Robison and Buchanan ; Magoulick and Lynch ) and the federally threatened Leopard Darter Percina pantherina (endemic to a few headwater streams in the Ouachita Mountains of southeastern Oklahoma and southwestern Arkansas; Zale et al. ).…”
Section: Headwaters Support Imperiled Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%