Occupancy Urbanism: Radicalizing Politics and Economy beyond Policy and Programs

Abstract

This article proposes a narrative of city contestations beyond policy and programs. It considers why Indian metro elites, large land developers and international donors paradoxically lobby for comprehensive planning when confronting 'vote bank politics' by the poor. Poor groups, claiming public services and safeguarding territorial claims, open up political spaces that appropriate institutions and fuel an economy that builds complex alliances. Such spaces, here termed 'occupancy urbanism', are materialized by land shaped into multiple de-facto tenures deeply embedded in lower bureaucracy. While engaging the state, these locality politics remain autonomous of it. Such a narrative views city terrains as being constituted by multiple political spaces inscribed by complex local histories. This politics is substantial and poses multiple crises for global capital. Locally embedded institutions subvert high-end infrastructure and mega projects. 'Occupancy urbanism' helps poor groups appropriate real estate surpluses via reconstituted land tenure to fuel small businesses whose commodities jeopardize branded chains. Finally, it poses a political consciousness that refuses to be disciplined by NGOs and well-meaning progressive activists and the rhetoric of 'participatory planning'. This is also a politics that rejects 'developmentalism' where 'poverty' is ghettoized via programs for 'basic needs' allowing the elite 'globally competitive economic development'. Copyright (c) 2008 The Author. Journal Compilation (c) 2008 Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

India's Urban Revolution: Geographies of Displacement beyond Gentrification

“…These documents provided a form of de facto tenure security. Later settlements secured access to vacant public land using political benefactors' leverage to broker deals with bureaucrats-what Benjamin (2008) calls 'occupancy urbanism'.…”

Water marginalization at the urban fringe: environmental justice and urban political ecology across the North–South divide

“…Much more than a collection of top-down regulations or a discrete set of state agencies, the everyday state comes into view through quotidian, messy negotiations between citizens, and the state in which the boundaries between the two are quite blurred. The everyday state is exemplified, for instance, by the lower-level "porous" (Benjamin, 2008) bureaucrat who shares cultural reciprocities with lower-income groups. In Indian cities, the everyday state appears as the frontline water engineer or local politician who provides water access in informal settlements, often in return for small bribes or votes.…”

Religious Architecture : Anthropological Perspectives

“…If, following in the footsteps of Gandhi, India's villages were long thought to hold the key to the country's identity, values and future, today India's cities are not only growing phenomenally -fed by migrants and commuters from rural hinterlands across India -but have become sites for cutting-edge global innovation in urban capital extraction, deregulated planning, informal living, insurgent and gated citizenship and fierce contests between an emergent middle class with world-class aspirations and the poor whom many would like to expel in the name of the city beautiful (Roy 2009;Roy 2011b;Benjamin 2008;Weinstein 2008;Holston 2007). Highly dynamic, creative, productive and conflicted, these are cities, as Ananya Roy (2011a) remarks so incisively, in which neither neoliberalism nor justice are guaranteed to be the outcome.…”