2007
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2007.897645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupant Classification Using Range Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ToF sensors provide a direct way for acquiring 3D surface information of objects with a single allsolid-state ToF camera by measuring the time of flight of an actively emitted optical reference signal in the infrared spectral range [2]. More recently, applications like obstacle detection [12], gesture recognition [5][6] and automotive passenger classification [4] We investigated the possibilities of extracting a respiration signal from these 3D data and to distinguish abdominal and thoracic breathing based on this information. To emphasize technical differences between markerbased/marker-less stereo-vision approaches, spirometry and our ToF-based approach we briefly will compare certain techniques in the following: Marker-less stereo vision vs. ToF: The main difference between both systems is how depth information is achieved.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ToF sensors provide a direct way for acquiring 3D surface information of objects with a single allsolid-state ToF camera by measuring the time of flight of an actively emitted optical reference signal in the infrared spectral range [2]. More recently, applications like obstacle detection [12], gesture recognition [5][6] and automotive passenger classification [4] We investigated the possibilities of extracting a respiration signal from these 3D data and to distinguish abdominal and thoracic breathing based on this information. To emphasize technical differences between markerbased/marker-less stereo-vision approaches, spirometry and our ToF-based approach we briefly will compare certain techniques in the following: Marker-less stereo vision vs. ToF: The main difference between both systems is how depth information is achieved.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for Smart Airbag systems, Devarakota et al [6] used 3-D images to classify vehicle occupants as adults or children, leaning forward or backward. A pedestrian detection system based on depth and intensity images was proposed by Rapus et al [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The given values refer to the error in reconstructing a 3D geometry of a cube with known dimensions from multiple acquired frames. 5 The given values refer to the relative error in estimating the translation/rotation of the robot the data acquisition devices were mounted on.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-of-Flight (ToF) imaging provides a direct way for acquiring 3D surface information of objects and scenes in the current field-of-view [1]. More recently, ToF sensors are used in a wider range of applications like obstacle detection [2], gesture recognition [3] [4] and automotive passenger classification [5]. For more complex application areas like map building, robot navigation or scene exploration, building a 3D model of a scene larger than the field-of-view of the applied ToF sensor imposes a 3D/3D-registration problem: Partially nonoverlapping 3D surface points have to be transformed into a common coordinate system by estimating the extrinsic parameters of the range measuring sensor at each acquisition time step.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%