SAE Technical Paper Series 1987
DOI: 10.4271/872216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupant Injury Patterns in Crashes with Airbag Equipped Government Sponsored Cars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curb tests were not severe enough to ensure that the sensors would not close in a test up to the limit of potential occupant injury. Nevertheless, these tests certainly strengthen the belief that unwanted deployments due to rough driving would not occur in routine use (Backaitis and Roberts, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The curb tests were not severe enough to ensure that the sensors would not close in a test up to the limit of potential occupant injury. Nevertheless, these tests certainly strengthen the belief that unwanted deployments due to rough driving would not occur in routine use (Backaitis and Roberts, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, belt use of drivers does not drop in cars equipped with air bags (Williams et al, 1990). While airbags can reduce injury both among belted and unbelted occupants, the most effective way to prevent injury is the joint use of a lap-shoulder belt and an airbag (Backaitis and Roberts, 1987;Evans, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thoracic injuries among belted occupants could be reduced by means of improved design of safety belts, such as elimination of belts that do not automatically retract after an occupant moves forward loosening the belt, and inclusion of pre-tensioners that tighten the belt immediately at crash impact (Viano 1988). Finally, standard installation of airbag restraint systems in all cars would not only provide additional protection from thoracic and other injuries among belted occupants, but would provide substantial protection to those occupants who refuse to use safety belts despite a compulsory use law (Backaitis and Roberts 1987…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%