2014
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Asbestos Exposure and Risk of Pleural Mesothelioma, Lung Cancer, and Laryngeal Cancer in the Prospective Netherlands Cohort Study

Abstract: Asbestos levels encountered at the lower end of the exposure distribution may be associated with an increased risk of pleural mesothelioma, lung cancer, and laryngeal cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
49
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study in the NLCS using DOMJEM was, however, able to corroborate the well-known association between asbestos and pleural mesothelioma. 7 Finally, several associations with overall gastric cancer and GNCA were reduced and became non-significant after adjusting for smoking status. Therefore, the assumption that potential confounders are only weakly correlated with asbestos exposure seems not totally justified.…”
Section: Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A previous study in the NLCS using DOMJEM was, however, able to corroborate the well-known association between asbestos and pleural mesothelioma. 7 Finally, several associations with overall gastric cancer and GNCA were reduced and became non-significant after adjusting for smoking status. Therefore, the assumption that potential confounders are only weakly correlated with asbestos exposure seems not totally justified.…”
Section: Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6,7 Several exposure variables were defined: ever versus never exposed to asbestos (yes/no), duration of exposure (years), cumulative exposure (CE; unit-years), ever versus never highly exposed to asbestos (yes/no) and duration of high exposure (years).…”
Section: Occupational Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since HR of PhC and OCPC increased after adjustment for especially alcohol consumption and socioeconomic status, taking lifestyle factors into account may be important when studying these cancers. Furthermore, while our JEM-based exposure assessment possibly entailed non-differential exposure misclassification resulting most likely in bias towards the null value, a previous study in the NLCS using both DOMJEM and FINJEM was able to demonstrate the well-known associations between asbestos and cancers of the pleura and lungs (16). In addition, as study subjects were between 55-69 years of age at the start of the study in 1986, the amount of exposure misclassification resulting from the fact that we had no information on occupational history from 1986-2003 will probably be limited.…”
Section: Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal Cancer Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were defined, which we have described in more detail elsewhere: ever versus never occupationally exposed to asbestos (yes/no), cumulative exposure [CE; a combined measure of the probability (P), intensity (I), and duration (years) of exposure, measured in fiber-years/ml (f-y/ ml) (FINJEM) or unit-years (DOMJEM)], ever versus never highly exposed to asbestos (yes/no), and duration of high exposure (years) (16).…”
Section: Asbestos Exposure Variables Several Exposure Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%