2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4844-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational blood exposures in health care workers: incidence, characteristics, and transmission of bloodborne pathogens in South Korea

Abstract: BackgroundHealth care workers (HCWs) are at high risk for occupational blood exposures (OBEs) and transmission of bloodborne pathogens. This study elucidated the incidence rate and epidemiological characteristics of OBEs among HCWs and investigated the pathogen transmission rate for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).MethodsSelf-reported OBEs from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015 were obtained from the electronic recording system. OBE incidence densitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
38
5
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
38
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, higher prevalence of occupational exposure to HIV infection among health care workers than the prevalence found in the current study has been reported by several other researchers in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the world [16]. But, our findings on prevalence of occupational exposure are above that obtained from similar studies conducted in Poland [10],Kuwait [17], South Korea [18] and Northern Nigeria [2]. This difference in prevalence of HIV observed in previous studies and our present study could be as a result of the difference in the study setting, study design and other methodological techniques.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…On the contrary, higher prevalence of occupational exposure to HIV infection among health care workers than the prevalence found in the current study has been reported by several other researchers in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the world [16]. But, our findings on prevalence of occupational exposure are above that obtained from similar studies conducted in Poland [10],Kuwait [17], South Korea [18] and Northern Nigeria [2]. This difference in prevalence of HIV observed in previous studies and our present study could be as a result of the difference in the study setting, study design and other methodological techniques.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…With regard to the clinical areas, incidents occurred mainly in wards (38.8%) and Emergency department (35.8%) followed by Operation theatre (14.92%). This is similar to the findings in a study done by Lee et al 6 Among job categories, exposures were encountered mainly by Doctors who contributed for 53.73% of the incidents, followed by staffnurses (22.4%) and others which is in concordance with other studies 3,12 . Among doctors, interns and post graduate students accounted for majority of the incidents which corresponds with other reports from India 13,14 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Though health care organizations have protocols to manage OBEs, OBE rates which reflect the lacunae in preventive protocols and negligence among HCWs and OBE associated infections in HCW are poorly evaluated 6 . All healthcare institutions should ensure that HCW receive training to recognize and report occupational blood exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are consistent and similar to the Bosnia/Herzegovinian, Cameroonian, Saudi Arabian studies on risk of occupational exposure conducted [9][12] [13]. On the contrary, higher prevalence of occupational exposure to HIV infection among health care workers than the prevalence found in the current study has been reported by several other researchers in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the world [14].But, our findings on prevalence of occupational exposure are above that obtained from similar studies conducted in Poland [8] ,Kuwait [15] , South Korea [16] and Northern Nigeria [17].This difference in prevalence of HIV observed in previous studies and our present study could be as a result of the difference in the study setting, study design and other methodological techniques. The differential in the level of training received by the health care workers in different study settings could also contribute to the variation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%