2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.996390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Choice and the Spirit of Capitalism

Abstract: The British Industrial Revolution triggered a reversal in the social order whereby the landed elite was replaced by industrial capitalists rising from the middle classes as the economically dominant group. Many observers have linked this transformation to the contrast in values between a hard-working and thrifty middle class and an upper class imbued with disdain for work. We propose an economic theory of preference formation in which both the divergence of attitudes across social classes and the ensuing rever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
141
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(43 reference statements)
7
141
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The implications of the proposed theory for the class origin of entrepreneurs during the Industrial Revolution are complementary to those of Doepke and Zilibotti [11, 12]. Their theory suggests that a new class of entrepreneurs rising from the middle classes, imbued with ethics emphasizing patience and savings, proved most capable of profiting from new economic opportunities, and eventually surpassed the pre-industrial elite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The implications of the proposed theory for the class origin of entrepreneurs during the Industrial Revolution are complementary to those of Doepke and Zilibotti [11, 12]. Their theory suggests that a new class of entrepreneurs rising from the middle classes, imbued with ethics emphasizing patience and savings, proved most capable of profiting from new economic opportunities, and eventually surpassed the pre-industrial elite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…3 Bowles (1998), Bisin and Verdier (2000), Galor and Moav (2002), Rapoport and Vidal (2007), Doepke and Zilibotti (2008), and Galor and Michalopoulos (2012) explore additional mechanisms that may govern the evolution of preferences. Moreover, Dohmen et al (2012) establish empirically the presence of intergenerational transmission of risk aversion and trust and the importance of socialization in this transmission process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Another interesting paper on the importance of endogenous preferences is that by Doepke and Zilibotti (2008). They develop a theory of preference formation that is a key component in explaining the reversal of fortunes between the landowners and the emerging bourgeoisie at the outset of the Industrial Revolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%