2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational dermal exposure to nanoparticles and nano-enabled products: Part 2, exploration of exposure processes and methods of assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
18
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…After 60 days of dermal exposure, nTiO2 reaches different tissues and pathological lesions can be observed. Other studies indicated the penetration of engineered nanoparticles (ENP) through intact or damaged human skin [9]- [12]. Based on these findings, workers must be sure to wear highly effective chemical protective clothing (CPC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 60 days of dermal exposure, nTiO2 reaches different tissues and pathological lesions can be observed. Other studies indicated the penetration of engineered nanoparticles (ENP) through intact or damaged human skin [9]- [12]. Based on these findings, workers must be sure to wear highly effective chemical protective clothing (CPC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skin is the largest organ of the body, accounting for up to 10% of body mass, as well as being a highly effective interface between an organism and the external environment, including nanoparticles (Gujjar and Banga, 2014;Labouta and Schneider, 2013;Ostrowski et al, 2014;Patzelt and Lademann, 2013). Penetration is thought to be affected by various fac-tors, especially by dermal structure and integrity (Brouwer et al, 2016;Crosera et al, 2009). In particular, skin diseases involving barrier alternations, which are common in humans, may alter the penetration of nanoparticles (Avalos et al, 2014;Brouwer et al, 2016;Larese Filon et al, 2015;Rigo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penetration is thought to be affected by various fac-tors, especially by dermal structure and integrity (Brouwer et al, 2016;Crosera et al, 2009). In particular, skin diseases involving barrier alternations, which are common in humans, may alter the penetration of nanoparticles (Avalos et al, 2014;Brouwer et al, 2016;Larese Filon et al, 2015;Rigo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) Although NPs may not penetrate to living skin tissue, few studies investigate the removal of NPs from the skin surface. (9)(10)(11) The adherence of spilled or deposited solid nanopowder onto uncovered skin is the likely exposure scenario for workers handling dry NPs. For example, the possibility of dermal exposure from handling NPs or touching contaminated surfaces are present in our laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%