2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational hazards and social disability insurance

Abstract: Using retrospective data, we introduce evidence that occupational exposure significantly affects disability risk. Incorporating this into a general equilibrium model, social disability insurance (SDI) affects welfare through (i) the classic, risk-sharing channel and (ii) a new channel of occupational reallocation. Both channels can increase welfare, but at the optimal SDI they are at odds. Welfare gains from additional risk-sharing are reduced by overly incentivizing workers to choose risky occupations. In a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I complement their work by discussing the interaction between public and private DI for alternative public DI schedules and how it translates into welfare-improving public DI policies. More broadly, my paper is related to the literature which studies how public DI compensates individuals for working in high-risk jobs (Jacobs, 2020;Michaud and Wiczer, 2018); the incentive effects of public DI on earnings and employment (e.g. Autor et al (2019), Gelber et al (2017), Meyer and Mok (2019), Mullen and Staubli (2016), and Ruh and Staubli (2019)), and the productivity of (rejected) claimants (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I complement their work by discussing the interaction between public and private DI for alternative public DI schedules and how it translates into welfare-improving public DI policies. More broadly, my paper is related to the literature which studies how public DI compensates individuals for working in high-risk jobs (Jacobs, 2020;Michaud and Wiczer, 2018); the incentive effects of public DI on earnings and employment (e.g. Autor et al (2019), Gelber et al (2017), Meyer and Mok (2019), Mullen and Staubli (2016), and Ruh and Staubli (2019)), and the productivity of (rejected) claimants (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in section 2, insurance companies map occupations into discrete risk groups, which capture risk heterogeneity, but also correlates with income, so I add risk heterogeneity as an additional state to my model (see alsoMichaud and Wiczer (2018)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%