1966
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5506.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational infections in the Edinburgh abattoir.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the seroprevalence in slaughterhouse workers and the community suggests that workers are significantly more exposed to C. burnetii than the equivalent age-group in the male population. This is consistent with other studies that have demonstrated a higher seroprevalence in slaughterhouse workers than other occupation groups [ 12 , 32 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between the seroprevalence in slaughterhouse workers and the community suggests that workers are significantly more exposed to C. burnetii than the equivalent age-group in the male population. This is consistent with other studies that have demonstrated a higher seroprevalence in slaughterhouse workers than other occupation groups [ 12 , 32 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The apparent seroprevalence for antibodies to C. burnetii in slaughterhouse workers in western Kenya was 37.1% (95% CI 33.2–41.2%), the prevalence when adjusted for the estimated sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA was 31.8% (95% CI 27.2–36.4%) and for the study design was 38.9% (95% CI 34.8–42.9%). Previous reports have estimated seroprevalence of Q fever in slaughterhouse workers to range from 5 to 90% [ 12 , 14 , 15 , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] ]. It is difficult to compare our results with reports from different regions because different diagnostic tests have been used [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used tests were the Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement (Woodcock et al, 2001) (eight studies, four of which shared the same lead author) and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) (Wechsler, 2005) (five studies). The following measures were used in no more than two studies: a non-standardised teacher rating scale of academic skills, the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (Achenbach and Rescorla, 2001), the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) (Jastak and Wilkinson, 1984), the Differential Ability Scales (DAS) Achievement Tests (Elliott, 1990), the Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude (Hammill, 1985), the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (Kaufman and Kaufman, 1985), the Wechsler Objective Reading and Numerical Dimensions (Rust et al, 1993), the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (Torgesen et al, 1997), the Central Institute of Test Development School Attainment Test (see Driessen et al, 2008), the Neale Analysis of Reading (Neale, 1958), Schonell Graded Spelling Test (Schonell and Schonell, 1960), and Enright Diagnostic Math Test (Enright, 1983). Assessments were usually administered by the researchers rather than the school or the students’ teachers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ticks transmit the virus to animals, however, natural exposure to humans is rare [ 33 ]. Instead humans that are exposed to infected animals such as veterinarians, farmers, butchers, and abattoir workers, as well as laboratory scientists have acquired LIV infection [ 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. In between the years of 1934 and 1991, 31 human cases of LIV was described [ 62 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%