2018
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6727a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Mercury Exposure at a Fluorescent Lamp Recycling Facility — Wisconsin, 2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, human exposure to this metal has occurred due to contamination of the food chain, especially methyl-mercury contamination of fish products, or in specific work contexts such as mining. More recently, the workplaces that are still potentially involved in this type of exposure are the following: orthodontics and dental activities, due to the use of mercury-based amalgams [ 63 , 64 , 65 ]; chlorine production plants, in which large quantities of mercury are used (100 tons to produce 50,000 tons of chlorine) [ 66 ]; the disposal and recycling of fluorescent lamps [ 67 , 68 ]; and gold mining, especially in developing countries [ 69 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, human exposure to this metal has occurred due to contamination of the food chain, especially methyl-mercury contamination of fish products, or in specific work contexts such as mining. More recently, the workplaces that are still potentially involved in this type of exposure are the following: orthodontics and dental activities, due to the use of mercury-based amalgams [ 63 , 64 , 65 ]; chlorine production plants, in which large quantities of mercury are used (100 tons to produce 50,000 tons of chlorine) [ 66 ]; the disposal and recycling of fluorescent lamps [ 67 , 68 ]; and gold mining, especially in developing countries [ 69 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recycling workers have exceptionally high exposures to the toxic element mercury (Hg) globally [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Yet there is no known threshold for safe mercury exposure [1] and evidence indicates that current thresholds for tolerable workplace exposure may be inadequate to protect workers [2,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recycling workers have exceptionally high exposures to the toxic element mercury (Hg) globally [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Yet there is no known threshold for safe mercury exposure [1] and evidence indicates that current thresholds for tolerable workplace exposure may be inadequate to protect workers [2,5]. Globalization has increased the transfer of hazardous products without a corresponding strengthening in safeguards for their proper disposal; e-waste (i.e., discarded electric and electronic items) is one of the clearest examples of this phenomenon, leading to unequal health risks in the Global South [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3][4][5] Such take-home exposures can happen with a variety of chemicals including pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos, mercury, and others. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] If a family is vulnerable to take-home, they may also experience other hazards with barriers to care, possibly contributing to health disparities. 15 Workplaces that assess and monitor lead exposures according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's lead protection standard 16 are not required to evaluate take-home issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%