2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational mercury exposure in association with prevalence of multiple sclerosis and tremor among US dentists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar trends have been observed elsewhere, such as in German children (Link et al. 2007) and among U.S. dental professionals (Anglen et al. 2015; Goodrich et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar trends have been observed elsewhere, such as in German children (Link et al. 2007) and among U.S. dental professionals (Anglen et al. 2015; Goodrich et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Dentists with less than 30 years of experience displayed more stress. Lack of experience, low income, uncooperative patients, and dental procedurerelated factors were the main significant factors that caused stress Occupational mercury exposure in association with prevalence of multiple sclerosis and tremor among US dentists 15) 13902 dentists Investigative 0.18% reported MS and 1.24% reported tremor.…”
Section: 4%-lower Backmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupational exposure to elemental mercury vapor in a dental setting is primarily through inhalation during the preparation, insertion, polishing, and removal of amalgam fillings, including storage of amalgam waste before disposal [24]. Occupational elemental mercury exposure in dentists could be responsible for the higher on average prevalence of MS in dentists than that in the general population in the USA [25]. Mercury vapor levels in ambient air could exceed the maximum acceptable value during the removal of amalgam in artificial teeth when no water spray or suction is used [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%