2019
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational radiation exposure and excess additive risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists

Abstract: ObjectivesPrevious analyses of cataract in radiation-exposed populations have assessed relative risk; radiogenic excess additive risk (EAR), arguably of more public health importance, has not been estimated. Previous analysis of a large prospective cohort of US radiologic technologists (USRT) quantified excess relative risk of cataract in relation to occupational radiation dose. We aim to assess EARs of cataract.MethodsWe estimated EARs of cataract/cataract surgery in the USRT cohort using generalised additive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ICRP has classified cataract disease as a tissue reaction effect (International Commission on Radiological Protection 2012), with a threshold dose of 0.5 Gy below which there would be minimal excess risk. This is bordering on inconsistency with the findings in a number of datasets, in particular the USRT, in which there is significant excess risk under 100 mGy, although no association was seen for cataract extractions (Little et al 2018a;Little, Cahoon, et al 2020).…”
Section: Cataractmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The ICRP has classified cataract disease as a tissue reaction effect (International Commission on Radiological Protection 2012), with a threshold dose of 0.5 Gy below which there would be minimal excess risk. This is bordering on inconsistency with the findings in a number of datasets, in particular the USRT, in which there is significant excess risk under 100 mGy, although no association was seen for cataract extractions (Little et al 2018a;Little, Cahoon, et al 2020).…”
Section: Cataractmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Solar UVR exposure (S€ oderberg et al 2016), diabetes, high BMI, cigarette smoking, corticosteroid medicines and ocular trauma are well-established risk factors for cataracts (Christen et al 1992;Cruickshanks et al 1992;Hodge et al 1995;Floud et al 2016). These factors have not been suggested as likely confounders of the radiation dose-response in the studies considered here that collected relevant information (Worgul et al 2007;Neriishi et al 2012;Little et al 2018a;Little, Cahoon, et al 2020;Su et al 2021). There is epidemiological (Delcourt et al 2005;Zoric et al 2008) and experimental (Devi et al 1965) evidence that cataract is correlated with malnutrition.…”
Section: Cataractmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All studies (15/15) reviewed by Jacob et al showed IR leads to a general excess of cataracts, while some studies showed excess PSCs (8/15 studies), cortical cataracts (4/15 studies), or nuclear cataracts (4/15 studies). The subjects of more recent low dose cataract studies include workers at the Mayak nuclear fuel reprocessing facility (low and moderate doses) (Azizova et al 2018) and US radiologic technologists (Little et al 2020). In addition, survivors of childhood and adolescent cancers had a linear dose-related, long-term risk of pre-senile cataracts with IR exposures as low as 0.5 Gy (Chodick et al 2016).…”
Section: Radiation As a Risk Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence suggesting that orthopaedic surgeons are at greater risk of the development of malignancy, a possible consequence of increased occupational exposure to ionising radiation [ 1 , 2 ]. An association has also been identified between occupational radiation exposure and male infertility, as well as the development of cataracts [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%