Occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide register-based study of the Danish workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020–2021

Abstract

ObjectiveMost earlier studies on occupational risk of COVID-19 covering the entire workforce are based on relatively rare outcomes such as hospital admission and mortality. This study examines the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection by occupational group based on real-time PCR (RT-PCR) tests.MethodsThe cohort includes 2.4 million Danish employees, 20–69 years of age. All data were retrieved from public registries. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of first-occurring positive RT-PCR test from week 8 of 2020 to week 50 of 2021 were computed by Poisson regression for each four-digit Danish Version of the International Standard Classification of Occupations job code with more than 100 male and 100 female employees (n=205). Occupational groups with low risk of workplace infection according to a job exposure matrix constituted the reference group. Risk estimates were adjusted by demographic, social and health characteristics including household size, completed COVID-19 vaccination, pandemic wave and occupation-specific frequency of testing.ResultsIRRs of SARS-CoV-2 infection were elevated in seven healthcare occupations and 42 occupations in other sectors, mainly social work activities, residential care, education, defence and security, accommodation and transportation. No IRRs exceeded 2.0. The relative risk in healthcare, residential care and defence/security declined across pandemic waves. Decreased IRRs were observed in 12 occupations.DiscussionWe observed a modestly increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees in numerous occupations, indicating a large potential for preventive actions. Cautious interpretation of observed risk in specific occupations is needed because of methodological issues inherent in analyses of RT-PCR test results and because of multiple statistical tests.

Use and misuse of research: Canada’s response to covid-19 and its health inequalities

“…A limitation to tailoring covid-19 responses was the lack of person level data collection inclusive of social determinants of health including racial identity and exposure risks such as occupation and housing. Such person level data are part of routine data systems in countries (eg, Denmark, Sweden) that were able to quickly provide some of the earliest and powerful evidence of health inequalities 5152. This limitation in data, alongside critical governance issues,53 shows that Canada was not prepared to respond systematically to a pandemic shaped by health inequalities.…”

Reduction of acute respiratory infections in day-care by non-pharmaceutical interventions: a narrative review

“…Research has shown that work in DCCs increases the risk of hospitalization due to pneumonia (14). Moreover, recent findings by Bonde et al (15) reveal that childcare workers in Denmark faced an elevated risk of contracting COVID-19 during the pandemic, like that of healthcare workers. Notably, employees in DCCs and teachers exhibit one of the highest sickness absence rates in Denmark, with an average of 13.5 sick days per year compared to approximately 8 days per year for all employees (16).…”

Sociodemographic inequalities in the incidence of COVID-19 in National Household Sample Survey cohort, Brazil, 2020

“…In the United Kingdom, for example, in a cohort study of residents across the country, a higher risk of infections was found in males and with a lower level of education 5 . In Denmark, a national occupational cohort allowed identifying a higher risk in healthcare occupations 6 .…”