1981
DOI: 10.2307/1924218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in Occupational Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
405
3
27

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 775 publications
(447 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
12
405
3
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies find that people in more feminized occupations have characteristics that are likely to deter lead migration and to promote tied migration. For example, they earn less (England et al, 1994) and have low levels of education (Polachek, 1981), labour market experience (Duncan and Hoffman, 1979), job specialization and on-the-job training (Tam, 1997), and high rates of part-time work (Blackwell, 2001). Therefore, any effects of the sex-segregation of occupations on family migration may be caused by compositional differences in the personal endowments of workers in different occupational sex-types.…”
Section: -The Effects Of Occupational Sex-segregation On Family Migramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies find that people in more feminized occupations have characteristics that are likely to deter lead migration and to promote tied migration. For example, they earn less (England et al, 1994) and have low levels of education (Polachek, 1981), labour market experience (Duncan and Hoffman, 1979), job specialization and on-the-job training (Tam, 1997), and high rates of part-time work (Blackwell, 2001). Therefore, any effects of the sex-segregation of occupations on family migration may be caused by compositional differences in the personal endowments of workers in different occupational sex-types.…”
Section: -The Effects Of Occupational Sex-segregation On Family Migramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework enables one to apply the human capital model to predict gender differences in occupational choice (Polachek, 1979(Polachek, , 1981. Workers expecting to drop out the longest minimize atrophy costs by choosing occupations with the lowest depreciation.…”
Section: Heterogeneous Human Capital and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the prediction of a wage advantage for women at entry into work finds little empirical support, which casts doubts on this theory (Light and Ureta, 1995;Loprest, 1992;Kunze, 2005). Nonetheless, Polachek (1981) More in line with the extant empirical findings are models emphasizing firm-specific training and firm-based allocation mechanisms into jobs. Two such models are the firm job-rationing model in Kuhn (1993) and the job-matching model in Barron et al (1993).…”
Section: Human Capital and The Gender Wage Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%