2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Therapy and Tools for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outcomes addressed therapy intensity, therapy focus, and length of stay. Discipline-specific researchers have found it necessary to supplement these standardized measure outcomes with additional information: an audit of client selected goals (Welch & Forster, 2003); discipline-specific instruments (Baldelli, Boiardi, Ferrari, Bianchi, & Hunscott Bianchi, 2004;Heinemann & Hamilton, 2000); and qualitative research methodology (Unsworth & Cunningham, 2002). Program management outcomes may not demonstrate that client function improvement is attributable to occupational therapy input but rather to the participation of the multidisciplinary team (Unsworth & Cunningham).…”
Section: Uniqueness Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes addressed therapy intensity, therapy focus, and length of stay. Discipline-specific researchers have found it necessary to supplement these standardized measure outcomes with additional information: an audit of client selected goals (Welch & Forster, 2003); discipline-specific instruments (Baldelli, Boiardi, Ferrari, Bianchi, & Hunscott Bianchi, 2004;Heinemann & Hamilton, 2000); and qualitative research methodology (Unsworth & Cunningham, 2002). Program management outcomes may not demonstrate that client function improvement is attributable to occupational therapy input but rather to the participation of the multidisciplinary team (Unsworth & Cunningham).…”
Section: Uniqueness Of Performancementioning
confidence: 99%