1983
DOI: 10.1177/030802268304600711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Therapy Assessment of Functional Problems in the Rehabilitation of the Severely Head Injured

Abstract: The multiple and complex problems of the head injured patient require comprehensive and systematic evaluation. While physical and psychological assessments are well established, there is a notable absence of adequately standardised assessments of functional ability for clinical application by occupational therapists. Accordingly, a battery of tests has been devised covering four major areas of functional ability: visual perception; constructional ability; sensorimotor function; and execution of complex instruc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurement scales designed for multidisciplinary use have also been developed to determine level of function, and these are being increasingly used to demonstrate the functional gain shown by patients throughout the rehabilitation process (Mahoney and Barthel, 1965;Hamilton et ai, 1987;Johnston et ai, 1992;Rappaport et aI, 1992;Powell et ai, 1994;Schut and Stam, 1994). Specifically within occupational therapy, in an attempt to become more scientific in approach, standardised assessments are now available, but these tend to focus on the identification of the component skill deficit (Hadfield and Tyerman, 1983;Whiting et ai, 1985;Wilson et ai, 1985;Tyerman et ai, 1986). Some work has already been done in comparing different standardised assessment batteries (Bradley et ai, 1982;Sloan, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement scales designed for multidisciplinary use have also been developed to determine level of function, and these are being increasingly used to demonstrate the functional gain shown by patients throughout the rehabilitation process (Mahoney and Barthel, 1965;Hamilton et ai, 1987;Johnston et ai, 1992;Rappaport et aI, 1992;Powell et ai, 1994;Schut and Stam, 1994). Specifically within occupational therapy, in an attempt to become more scientific in approach, standardised assessments are now available, but these tend to focus on the identification of the component skill deficit (Hadfield and Tyerman, 1983;Whiting et ai, 1985;Wilson et ai, 1985;Tyerman et ai, 1986). Some work has already been done in comparing different standardised assessment batteries (Bradley et ai, 1982;Sloan, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%