2018
DOI: 10.4172/2332-0877.1000352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupationally Acquired P. Falciparum Malaria

Abstract: Although low, the risk of occupational malaria does exist. This report describes a rare case of occupational malaria in a non-endemic area with a favorable outcome despite the delayed diagnosis and calls for further research in the field of malaria post-exposure prophylaxis following accidental exposure to biological fluids.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 To date, four more cases of occupational malaria have been reported, with a median delay of incubation of 14 (range 9-18) days, all without postexposure prophylaxis. [12][13][14][15] In the sole previously published case postexposure prophylaxis, 6 P. falciparum malaria occurred 17 days after inoculation (breaking a capillary hematocrit tube containing infected blood suspension in laboratory) despite treatment by chloroquine because of acquired resistance of the strain. The potential better efficacy of ACT here is probably due to a higher schizonticidal activity than chloroquine, and such a high schizonticidal activity is probably required after exposure to parasitemic blood, 7 in which the most abundant parasitic stage corresponded to trophozoites forming in schizonts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 To date, four more cases of occupational malaria have been reported, with a median delay of incubation of 14 (range 9-18) days, all without postexposure prophylaxis. [12][13][14][15] In the sole previously published case postexposure prophylaxis, 6 P. falciparum malaria occurred 17 days after inoculation (breaking a capillary hematocrit tube containing infected blood suspension in laboratory) despite treatment by chloroquine because of acquired resistance of the strain. The potential better efficacy of ACT here is probably due to a higher schizonticidal activity than chloroquine, and such a high schizonticidal activity is probably required after exposure to parasitemic blood, 7 in which the most abundant parasitic stage corresponded to trophozoites forming in schizonts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%