2015
DOI: 10.1080/21564574.2015.1034792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence and ecological aspects of the two-fingered skinkChalcides mauritanicusin the Chafarinas Islands in North Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most plausible explanation for these differences between epigeal and fossorial reptiles may be that underground burrowing movements are energetically costly for fossorial reptiles [ 19 , 22 , 28 ], but see [ 62 ], as movements are also costly for subterranean rodents [ 63 , 64 ]. Probably due to these locomotory constraints, amphisbaenians [ 31 , 65 ], other fossorial reptiles [ 66 69 ], and also fossorial rodents [ 70 ], usually select microhabitats with sandy loose soils that are easier for burrowing. These patterns of soil selection might restrict the availability of areas suitable for amphisbaenians, and this limitation might initially be considered as a potential reason for the observed limited movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most plausible explanation for these differences between epigeal and fossorial reptiles may be that underground burrowing movements are energetically costly for fossorial reptiles [ 19 , 22 , 28 ], but see [ 62 ], as movements are also costly for subterranean rodents [ 63 , 64 ]. Probably due to these locomotory constraints, amphisbaenians [ 31 , 65 ], other fossorial reptiles [ 66 69 ], and also fossorial rodents [ 70 ], usually select microhabitats with sandy loose soils that are easier for burrowing. These patterns of soil selection might restrict the availability of areas suitable for amphisbaenians, and this limitation might initially be considered as a potential reason for the observed limited movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%