“…In China, the prevalence of G. duodenalis in this study was only lower than the prevalence of G . duodenalis in cattle in Shanghai (60.1%, 492/818) 32 , Sichuan (41.2%, 126/306) 34 , and Guangdong (74.2%, 288/388) 38 and higher than the prevalence data reported in Xinjiang (13.4%, 69/514) 4 ; Ningxia (4.38%, 74/1688) 37 and (2.12%, 29/1366) 24 ; Heilongjiang (5.2%, 42/814) 25 , 26 , (4.98%, 16/321) 27 and (15.4%, 8/52) 28 ; Jilin (6.63%, 25/377) 28 ; Liaoning (8.4%, 19/226) 28 ; Hubei ( 22.7%, 77/339) 29 ; Shandong (13.04%, 9/69, PCR) and (18.84%, 13/69, rapid kit) 30 ; Shaanxi (18.87%, 70/371) 31 ; Sichuan (9.4%, 26/278) 33 ; Beijing (1.70%, 14/822) 35 ; Gansu (1.0%, 14/1414) 36 and (2.63%, 33/1257) 37 ; Guangdong (2.2%, 31/1440) 39 ; Hebei and Tianjin (4.7%, 49/1040) 40 ; Henan (7.2%, 128/1777) 41 ; Jiangsu (20.6%, 281/1366) 42 ; Jiangxi (9.2%, 52/566) 43 ; Qinghai (10%, 39/389) 45 ; Tibet (3.8%, 17/442) 46 ; Yunnan (10.49%, 41/ 391) 47 ; Taiwan (19.87%, 31/156) 48 and that reported in the only survey on G. duodenalis in Inner Mongolia (9.3%, 10/108) 44 . However, it is difficult to compare prevalence data because they are influenced by a range of factors, including study design, diagnostic method, geographical conditions, total number of samples, age of animals, and sampling season 4 .…”