2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence and origin of non-martensitic acicular artifacts on NiTi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain a representative surface condition, the samples were ground using SiC abrasive (600, 1200, 2500, and 4000 grid). The last grinding step sufficed in producing a surface with mirror finish 33. After grinding, all samples were rinsed with deionized water and ethanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain a representative surface condition, the samples were ground using SiC abrasive (600, 1200, 2500, and 4000 grid). The last grinding step sufficed in producing a surface with mirror finish 33. After grinding, all samples were rinsed with deionized water and ethanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last grinding step sufficed in producing a surface with mirror finish. 33 After grinding, all samples were rinsed with deionized water and ethanol.…”
Section: Niti Samples and Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Jeol JSM-6460 scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an INCA X-Sight 350 energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) analysis aperture was used for microscopy and chemical analysis of the BM-LPZ interface. As per a recent study by Undisz et al [15], a dilute HF etchant was used for microstructure analysis to limit surface pitting and avoid the formation of surface artifacts. Crystallographic data were collected from the BM and LPZ structures using micro-x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 swabs for Dt5, 60 swabs for Dt12, and 72 swabs for Dt25. We used aqueous etching solution as suggested in (Undisz et al, 2011): 7.4% HF, 18.5% HNO 3 and 74.1% H 2 0. According to the manufacturer of the acids, the concentrations of HNO 3 and HF acids are 65% and 40%, respectively.…”
Section: Appendix B Microstructure Of Tubesmentioning
confidence: 97%