2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence and sources of microplastics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediments of Svalbard, Arctic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quick internet search shows that fishing nets made of green polypropylene fibres are myriad, and the very high concentration of polypropylene fibres from sample 9 strongly suggests that a beached polypropylene net had disintegrated there. Fisheries debris was also suggested as a prime source of microplastics detected in subtidal sediments of the fjords of Svalbard (Lin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Plastic Polymers and Fragmentation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A quick internet search shows that fishing nets made of green polypropylene fibres are myriad, and the very high concentration of polypropylene fibres from sample 9 strongly suggests that a beached polypropylene net had disintegrated there. Fisheries debris was also suggested as a prime source of microplastics detected in subtidal sediments of the fjords of Svalbard (Lin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Plastic Polymers and Fragmentation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rising plastic pollution of Svalbard's coastline could be due to local people or tourists, but the vast majority is likely transported to Svalbard's coastline by the surrounding ocean currents, with the debris originating from local and distant fishing activities as well as distant land-based sources (Bergmann et al, 2022a;Meyer et al, 2023 several studies have already investigated the amount and distribution of macroplastic and other large man-made debris along Svalbard's coastline (Nashoug, 2017;Jaskólski et al, 2018;Węsławski and Kotwicki, 2018;Falk-Andersson and Strietman, 2019;Falk-Andersson et al, 2021;Liutkus et al, 2022), including four studies where at least some of the data were collected by citizen scientists (Bergmann et al, 2017b;Strand et al, 2021;Meyer et al, 2023). While evidence of microplastics along the coasts and fjords of Svalbard has recently emerged Choudhary et al, 2022;Lin et al, 2022), baseline information on microplastic pollution levels of its beaches or Arctic beaches in general (Sundet et al, 2016;Sundet et al, 2017;Granberg et al, 2019;Blinovskaya et al, 2020) is still sparse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to a few years ago, ocean currents were thought to be the main transport pathways to remote locations, such as polar regions [15], but the detection of MPs in snow, ice, and air samples has proved that the atmosphere plays a critical role in their global spread to the Arctic [10,20,21]. In the Arctic region, MPs have been detected almost everywhere (i.e., rivers, oceans, sediments, and the associated biota) [10,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Regarding plastic pollution in marine biota, in Nordic marine environments, MPs were reported in 14 fish species, some of commercial importance, as well as in blue mussels and marine worms; ingestion of plastic particles was found also in many seabirds and mammals [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%