Tropical forest and swidden agriculture are declining, while industrial tree plantations are continuously expanding due to a robust global demand for timber and pulp. However, little is known about the processes, trends and mechanisms of the tropical forest-swidden-plantation (TFSP) nexus. Global ongoing initiatives including the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (UN-REDD Programme), not only have repeatedly emphasized the significance of conserving forests, reforestation and afforestation, but also pushed swidden agriculture to the forefront of a long-standing international debate of climate change and biodiversity. Many facets limit our understanding of swidden agriculture and its roles in forest loss and plantations expansion.The lack of geographic and demographic data and their dynamics across the tropics undoubtedly further aggravates this situation since the first appeals for eradication of shifting cultivation by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in the late 1950s. Although recent studies have significantly enriched our knowledge of forest loss and plantation expansion, previous research has proceeded separately and has yet to be integrated under the umbrella of 'sustainable development of swidden agriculture'. Efforts are needed to investigate the dynamics of the TFSP nexus for the sake of a synergetic goal of climate mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and poverty alleviation.industrial plantation expansion, natural forest loss, swidden agriculture transformation, the UN-REDD Programme, tropical forest-swidden-plantation (TFSP) nexus
| INTRODUCTIONSwidden agriculture (called many things, including shifting cultivation or slash-and-burn farming), has a variable length of fallow period and slash-and-burn intensity and is continuously evolving with much change since the mid-20th century (FAO Staff, 1957), some forms of swidden can be sustainable in human-environment that do not cause reduced fallow through population increase and/or commercial demand for crops/ produce context (Kukla et al., 2019). It remains a widespread but controversial farming practice and/or land use category especially in the hilly areas and low-medium mountains of the tropics [the Figure 1(A)] (Cairns, 2015;Heinimann et al., 2017;van Vliet et al., 2012). Sometimes, swidden is a straw to clutch for millions of impoverished upland ethnic groups facing constantly changing markets and meteorological disasters (e.g., floods and droughts caused by El Niño and La Niña) 2009;Smith & Dressler, 2019). The evolution and/or transformation not only matter the livelihoods and ethnic identity of swiddendependent uplanders, but it also trigger endless debates about swidden agriculture and how it relates to carbon emission or sequestration and biological diversity gain or loss (Fox