“…Yet, contrary to hydrophobic contaminants, for which it is considered that the role of mineral surfaces in their adsorption can be neglected (Mader et al, 1997), it is possible that for more hydrophilic compounds, such as those investigated below, mineral surfaces, which are also hydrophilic, may play a more important role (Schaffer et al, 2012;Scheytt et al, 2005), in particular clay minerals (Droge and Goss, 2013a;Thiebault, 2020). Due to their cation exchange capacity (which is the same as that of organic matter, Droge and Goss, 2013b) and high specific surface area, clay minerals are considered as favourable for the sorption of TrOCs, and especially cationic ones (Dordio et al, 2017;Thiebault et al, 2021b). Therefore, the objective of this paper is to try to go beyond TOC alone to understand the factors controlling the spatial dynamic of TrOC sedimentary occurrences within an anthropized catchment.…”