“…1B for possible evidence of the contrary). Accordingly, we follow the terminology first introduced in the Hurdiidae diagnosis of Lerosey-Aubril & Pates (2018) , and describe hurdiid frontal appendages as composed of: (1) a proximal region (or shaft/peduncle sensu Pates, Daley & Butterfield, 2019 ) typically composed of rarely more than one podomere (but see Lerosey-Aubril & Pates, 2018 ; Moysiuk & Caron, 2021 ), and usually associated with a single (absent in Cambroraster , possibly two in Pahvantia ) distally-located endite that differs in size (narrower and usually shorter), shape, or orientation from intermediate endites; (2) an intermediate region of classically five or six podomeres (possibly up to eight podomeres in Cordaticaris ; Sun, Zeng & Zhao, 2020b ), which are associated with long (length of endite >height of corresponding podomere), typically laminiform endites; and (3) a distal region that includes up to six podomeres (e.g., Stanleycaris ; Moysiuk & Caron, 2021 ) bearing much shorter, spiniform endites or no endites at all. In addition, when applied to the appendage: proximal and distal refer to the parts closest to or furthest from its insertion site on the body, respectively; ventral to the typically concave margin bearing the endites, and dorsal to the usually convex margin opposite to it.…”