2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2017.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence, removal, mass loading and environmental risk assessment of emerging organic contaminants in leachates, groundwaters and wastewaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recovery obtained from groundwater samples spiked at concentration levels of 0.03 µg/L were between 93% and 123%, while for samples spiked at concentration 4 µg/L were between 90% and 112%. A comparison of parameters obtained through the utilization of the USAEME-SFOD/GC-MS method developed using 1-undecanol as an extractant, with those attained by applying the USAEME/GC-MS method using chloroform as an extractant [31], shows that the accuracy and precision of both methods are similar, while the sensitivity of the method developed in this work is much better, primarily resulting from the smaller volume of 1-undecanol (20 µL) used for extraction compared to chloroform (70 µL), lower water solubility of 1-undecanol (5.7 mg/L) than chloroform (0.8 g/L), and, most likely, a higher solubility of target compounds in 1-undecanol. RSD-relative standard deviation; LoD-limit of detection; LoQ-limit of quantification.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recovery obtained from groundwater samples spiked at concentration levels of 0.03 µg/L were between 93% and 123%, while for samples spiked at concentration 4 µg/L were between 90% and 112%. A comparison of parameters obtained through the utilization of the USAEME-SFOD/GC-MS method developed using 1-undecanol as an extractant, with those attained by applying the USAEME/GC-MS method using chloroform as an extractant [31], shows that the accuracy and precision of both methods are similar, while the sensitivity of the method developed in this work is much better, primarily resulting from the smaller volume of 1-undecanol (20 µL) used for extraction compared to chloroform (70 µL), lower water solubility of 1-undecanol (5.7 mg/L) than chloroform (0.8 g/L), and, most likely, a higher solubility of target compounds in 1-undecanol. RSD-relative standard deviation; LoD-limit of detection; LoQ-limit of quantification.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature information from other studies shows that BPA and DEET were identified as the most commonly detected ECs in groundwater [32][33][34][35][36] with BPH being previously identified as one of the most widespread ECs in groundwater located under MSW landfills [31,[37][38][39]. Table 5.…”
Section: Groundwater Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the Ganges River Basin in India to the surface water in Milan, contaminants such as pharmaceuticals and personal care products have been detected. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] These contaminants are difficult to remove and can cause harm not only to humans but to wildlife and local ecosystems as well. Pharmaceuticals, personal care products, persistent organic pollutants, methanesulfonic acids, artificial sweeteners, transformation products, and engineered nanomaterials have all been identified as current contaminants of emerging concern (CECs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Recent studies, however, have reported its acute ecotoxicity and genotoxicity. 1,3 A comprehensive study on the occurrence of 19 multi-class emerging organic contaminants in three municipal solid waste landfills and three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) located in north east Poland was presented by Kapelewska et al 4 Benzophenone was present in all the 624 IVANČEV-TUMBAS et al samples analysed, with levels in WWTP effluent and groundwater above 1 µg•L -1 . Wu et al 5 investigated the environmental behaviour of benzophenone-type UV filters and their derivatives in four WWTPs, and their receiving surface waters (SW) in Shanghai, China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%