Ochre decor and cinnabar residues in Neolithic pottery from Vinča, Serbia

Abstract

The prehistoric site of Vinča, on the right bank of the River Danube, the territory of the City of Belgrade, first excavated by M. Vasić in 1931–34, provides Neolithic pottery dating back to 5200–4200 BC. Shards excavated in 1998 (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts) have a yellow coating on the external (convex) and red deposit on the internal (concave) side. Raman, IR and x‐ray identification proved that the yellow‐to‐red decor deposited on the external faces of pottery is made of ochre, a mixture of hematite, quartz and phyllosilicates. The red deposit found on some internal surfaces of the pottery consists of cinnabar (HgS) with some quartz and phyllosilicates. This indicates that cinnabar was not used for decor but for other purposes than and prepared or stored in ceramic utensils. A comparison is made with mercury ore from the Šuplja Stena mine located ∼20 km from Vinča village. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Raman identification of natural red to yellow pigments: ochre and iron‐containing ores

“…Two natural compounds, haematite and cinnabar, 21 are the most primitive and most attractive red pigments. The haematite-based pigment is called 'Bengara' (Bengal) in Japanese.…”

Raman spectroscopic discrimination of pigments and tempera paint model samples by principal component analysis on first‐derivative spectra

“…2nd millennium B.C. in China and since Neolithic period in Europe [33] ) and still in use, despite its toxicity. [30] Minium is red oxide of lead (Pb 3 O 4 ), also highly poisonous and one of the earliest pigments artificially prepared and still in use today.…”

Pottery Studies and Archaeometry: Between Scientific Analyses and Archaeological Interpretation

“…I dalje se suočavamo, naročito u našoj sredini, u kojoj su arheometrijska (Mioč et al 2004;Holclajtner-Antunović et al 2011;Damjanović et al 2014), ali i etnoarheološka istraživanja još uvek veoma retka (Djordjević 2005(Djordjević , 2013, sa nepoznavanjem mogućnosti analitičkih tehnika, dok s druge strane većinu istraživanja sprovode stručnjaci iz oblasti prirodnih nauka, iz čega proističu jednostrane, multidisciplinarne, a vrlo vrlo J V 694 retko interdisciplinarne studije. Na taj problem je u svetskoj arheologiji ukazivano tokom osamdesetih i devedesetih godina prošlog veka, međutim, on je i dalje aktuelan.…”