Rethinking the History of Skepticism 2009
DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004170612.i-238.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ockham’S Reliabilism And The Intuition Of Non-Existents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless a first wave of philosophers defended what appears to be Classical Infallibilist answers on which, roughly, intellect is in principle always in position to correct the senses: see e.g . Perler, , 387 and Grellard (, 132–3) on John Duns Scotus (c. 1265–1308) and Karger () on William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347; but see Pannaccio and Piché, for a fallibilist reading). However a second wave put forward answers that seem to reject Classical Infallibilism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless a first wave of philosophers defended what appears to be Classical Infallibilist answers on which, roughly, intellect is in principle always in position to correct the senses: see e.g . Perler, , 387 and Grellard (, 132–3) on John Duns Scotus (c. 1265–1308) and Karger () on William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347; but see Pannaccio and Piché, for a fallibilist reading). However a second wave put forward answers that seem to reject Classical Infallibilism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%