1996
DOI: 10.1042/bj3150889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oct-1 [corrected] and Oct-2 DNA-binding site specificity is regulated in vitro by different kinases

Abstract: The transcription factors Oct-1 and Oct-2 bind differentially to three octamer binding sequences corresponding to the octamer binding site from the H2B promoter [ATGCTAATAA], a simple TAATGARAT motif, found in herpes simplex virus IE4/5 genes [GCGGTAATGAGAT], and a perfect consensus overlapping octamer/TAATGARAT motif [ATGCTAATGAGAT]. By comparing the effects of protein kinase A, protein kinase C and casein kinase 2 in vitro on the binding of Oct-1 and Oct-2 to the three motifs, we show that the actions of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene expression profiling of t(14;18) lymphoma cells has not revealed increased expression of Oct or Bob-1 mRNA, so it is likely that the augmented expression of these factors does not occur at the transcriptional level (Husson et al, 2002;Robetorye et al, 2002). Both Oct-2 and Bob-1 are Oct-2 regulates Bcl-2 expression CA Heckman et al post-translationally modified, and this may contribute to their stability and activity in t(14;18) lymphoma cells (Tanaka and Herr, 1990;Grenfell et al, 1996;Inamoto et al, 1997;Zwilling et al, 1997). In addition, there are a number of Oct-2 isoforms that result from alternative splicing, which may also lead to more stable Oct-2 expression (Wirth et al, 1991;Annweiler et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene expression profiling of t(14;18) lymphoma cells has not revealed increased expression of Oct or Bob-1 mRNA, so it is likely that the augmented expression of these factors does not occur at the transcriptional level (Husson et al, 2002;Robetorye et al, 2002). Both Oct-2 and Bob-1 are Oct-2 regulates Bcl-2 expression CA Heckman et al post-translationally modified, and this may contribute to their stability and activity in t(14;18) lymphoma cells (Tanaka and Herr, 1990;Grenfell et al, 1996;Inamoto et al, 1997;Zwilling et al, 1997). In addition, there are a number of Oct-2 isoforms that result from alternative splicing, which may also lead to more stable Oct-2 expression (Wirth et al, 1991;Annweiler et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the Oct-1 protein can be phosphorylated by DNA-dependent protein kinase (41,53), which also phosphorylates IRF-3 (23). Notably, its phosphorylation can regulate its DNA binding activity (13,43). Furthermore, Oct-1 is postranslationally modified and its DNA binding activity is regulated during herpes simplex virus 1 infection (1).…”
Section: 59mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oct-1 is phosphorylated by different kinases in vitro (13,19) or in a cell cycle-dependent manner (38,43). On the other hand, Oct-1 phosphorylation is induced by stress stimuli and DNA damage (41).…”
Section: 59mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding site for Oct-1 has been identified and characterized at position 246 bp in the proximal human LPL promoter (32). Once phosphorylated on the homeodomain, its DNA binding activity could be inhibited in vivo and in vitro (33,34). Patients with a TYC substitution mutation in this region have low plasma LPL activity caused by an inability of Oct-1 binding (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%