2017
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Octogenarian liver grafts: Is their use for transplant currently justified?

Abstract: AIMTo analyse the impact of octogenarian donors in liver transplantation.METHODSWe present a retrospective single-center study, performed between November 1996 and March 2015, that comprises a sample of 153 liver transplants. Recipients were divided into two groups according to liver donor age: recipients of donors ≤ 65 years (group A; n = 102), and recipients of donors ≥ 80 years (group B; n = 51). A comparative analysis between the groups was performed. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean values an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(78 reference statements)
3
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported incidence of HAT lies between 1.6% and 4% in adult recipients 101,102,283 . Two patients (3,7%) both in the D75 group and the control group experienced HAT or stenosis, which is in line with other recent studies showing no increased occurrence of arterial complications in grafts from older compared to younger donors 203,205,206,273,274 .…”
Section: Vascular Complicationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reported incidence of HAT lies between 1.6% and 4% in adult recipients 101,102,283 . Two patients (3,7%) both in the D75 group and the control group experienced HAT or stenosis, which is in line with other recent studies showing no increased occurrence of arterial complications in grafts from older compared to younger donors 203,205,206,273,274 .…”
Section: Vascular Complicationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar results were published by Jimenez-Romero et al in 2017, with 64% 5-year GS for recipients from donors above 80 years. When HCV-positive recipients were excluded, 5-year GS rose to 77% 206 and found no difference in 5-year-all-cause graft loss when older livers were given to so-called preferred recipients, defined as first-time, non-urgent patients older than 45 years with BMI below 35 and indication for LT other than HVC and CIT under 8 hours 208 .…”
Section: Outcome In Lt Using Old Liversmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, with the growing use of elderly donors due to the unacceptable death rate in waiting lists, more favorable results have been demonstrated in recent studies using organs from donors older than 60, 70, and even 80 years of age …”
Section: Patient and Graft Survival Using Octogenarian Donors In Livementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, with the growing use of elderly donors due to the unacceptable death rate in waiting lists, more favorable results have been demonstrated in recent studies (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34) using organs from donors older than 60, 70, (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) and even 80 years of age. (20,26,28,41) There remains, however, concerns about the higher risk for primary nonfunction, delayed graft function, and worst longterm graft survival with the use of these super-old septuagenarian and octogenarian donors. (10,23,24) Among several octogenarian series, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival range between 75% and 100%, 40% and 86%, and 78.2% and 86%, respectively, (8,14,26,(42)(43)(44) whereas 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival varies between 75% and 100%, 61.2% and 81%, and 77.1% and 81%, respectively (Table 1).…”
Section: The Growing Gap Between Patients In Need Of Livermentioning
confidence: 99%