2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Octupolar excitation of ion motion in a Penning trap—A study performed at LEBIT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the ions of interest typically comprise less than 1% of the mass-separated beam from IGISOL, so to have, for example, a few 34 Ar ions in a bunch, we have to collect 2-3 orders-of-magnitude more ions -mostly 34 Cl and 34 S -in the RFQ buncher. Once a large enough bunch has been collected, it is sent to the first of the two Penning traps that constitute the JYFLTRAP setup.…”
Section: A Ion Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the ions of interest typically comprise less than 1% of the mass-separated beam from IGISOL, so to have, for example, a few 34 Ar ions in a bunch, we have to collect 2-3 orders-of-magnitude more ions -mostly 34 Cl and 34 S -in the RFQ buncher. Once a large enough bunch has been collected, it is sent to the first of the two Penning traps that constitute the JYFLTRAP setup.…”
Section: A Ion Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 1 for the mass-34 measurements, the purification process in the first Penning trap is sufficent to make clean bunches of 34 Ar, but it is not enough to separate 34 Cl from 34 Cl m . The same problem occurs in the case of mass-38 as well.…”
Section: A Ion Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations