2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocular chemical burns in the workplace: Epidemiological characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these professional circumstances, we observed that products for cleaning, maintenance, scouring and descaling are more frequent in a professional environment. This is fully consistent with the results from Quesada et al [14], which found that the service and construction sectors were the most affected (62.1% and 20.9% of cases, respectively). This is in accordance with the fact that products for an almost exclusively professional usage are also causes of average or severe damage: 1 case in 5 for the materials and products for using and treating construction materials (glues and solvents, moss and lichen removal), 22.5% of cases for surface disinfectants (22.5% of PSS 2 cases), even almost three quarters (71.4%) of cases of exposure to disinfectants for milking equipment and also the involvement of a concentrated product in 72.7% of cases of average exposure to household bleach.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under these professional circumstances, we observed that products for cleaning, maintenance, scouring and descaling are more frequent in a professional environment. This is fully consistent with the results from Quesada et al [14], which found that the service and construction sectors were the most affected (62.1% and 20.9% of cases, respectively). This is in accordance with the fact that products for an almost exclusively professional usage are also causes of average or severe damage: 1 case in 5 for the materials and products for using and treating construction materials (glues and solvents, moss and lichen removal), 22.5% of cases for surface disinfectants (22.5% of PSS 2 cases), even almost three quarters (71.4%) of cases of exposure to disinfectants for milking equipment and also the involvement of a concentrated product in 72.7% of cases of average exposure to household bleach.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, contrary to what was found in the literature, we found a majority of men only in cases of considerable severity (PSS 3) [8,13]. In a recent Spanish study, chemical burns represented 12.7% of ocular damage at the workplace and 11.9% of keratoconjunctivitis cases [14]. Under these professional circumstances, we observed that products for cleaning, maintenance, scouring and descaling are more frequent in a professional environment.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…[18] In the study of Quesada et al ocular chemical burns were the second most common workplace eye injury with 68.54% of men and 31.45% females getting affected. [19] The largest proportion of chemical eye injuries were seen in women in cleaning and kitchen jobs which results from splashing and spraying of liquids [20]. The cause has been attributed to, limited training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alkaline substances are more damaging to the eye than acidic substances because they have the inherent ability to penetrate the ocular structures due to their hydrophilic and lipophilic properties [ 5 , 9 ]. The deleterious effect of caustication depends on the nature and type of substance involved, as well as the length of time the substance was in contact with the eye [ 10 ], being the extent of ocular surface damage one of the most important prognostic factors for the visual outcome [ 1 , 2 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%