Ocular Dominance Effects on the Application of Monocular, Occluding Head-Mounted Displays

Kancler, David E.; Quill, Laurie L.

doi:10.1177/1071181397041002132

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sixteen male and female volunteers Tom the Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton Ohio, participated. Subjects with eyeglasses were omitted t?om the study; subjects with corrected vision by non-bifocal contact lenses were accepted (Blaha & Kistner, 1990;Kancler & Quill 1997).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Glasses Mounted Display Baseline Test: Comparing the GMD to Traditional Displays

Kancler

Quill

Revels

2000

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this test was to compare the performance of the Glasses-Mounted Display (GMD) with a standard desktop monitor. Although standard computers and their displays, such as a notebook computer with a liquid-crystal display (LCD), are appropriate for many applications outside the office, certain factors, such as increased mobility or hands-free requirements, can impede the usability of standard computers. The GMD provides a potential solution to the display requirements associated with these unique situations. The current study used three independent variables to test this: 1) Display (GMD vs. Laptop computer LCD), 2) Data Source (an internal location on the display vs. fiorn a separate, external CRT), and 3) Trial (six total trials). Results were mixed; although the interaction of Display x Data Source indicated the GMD may be useful in applications that involve visual attention switching. Subjective feedback indicated a greater familiarity and comfort level with a laptop computer and its LCD display. However, subjects also recognized the GMD's potential use for tasks involving contined areas, hands-busy operation, and tasks requiring continual switching of attention between the GMD and task enviromnent,

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Subjects with eyeglasses were omitted t?om the study; subjects with corrected vision by non-bifocal contact lenses were accepted (Blaha & Kistner, 1990;Kancler & Quill 1997). …”

Section: -546mentioning

confidence: 99%

Glasses Mounted Display Baseline Test: Comparing the GMD to Traditional Displays

Kancler

Quill

Revels

2000

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The University ofDayton Research Institute, in cooperation with these two organi7ations, conducted the field test and analysis. 10.…”

Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning

confidence: 95%

<title>Human interaction with wearable computer systems: a look at glasses-mounted displays</title>

et al. 1998

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the advancement oftechnology and the information explosion, integration of the two into performance aiding systems can have a significant impact on operational and maintenance environments. The Department of Defense and commercial industry have made great strides in digitizing and automating technical manuals and data to be presented on performance aiding systems. These performance aides are computerized interactive systems that provide procedures on how to operate and maintain fielded systems. The idea is to provide the end-user a system which is compatible with their work environment.The purpose of this paper is to show, historically, the progression of wearable computer aiding systems for maintenance environments, and then highlight the work accomplished in the design and development of glasses-mounted displays (GMD). The paper reviews work performed over the last seven years, then highlights, through review of a usability study, the advances made with GMDs. The use of portable computing systems, such as laptop and notebook computers, does not necessarily increase the accessibility ofthe displayed information while accomplishing a given task in a hands-busy, mobile work environment. The use of a GMD increases accessibility of the information by placing it in eye sight ofthe user without obstructing the surrounding environment. Although the potential utility for this type of display is great, hardware and human integration must be refined. Results from the Usability study show the usefulness and usability ofthe GMD in a mobile, hands-free environment.

show abstract

“…The intent of the current study is to performance and reduce aircraft downtime by develop an initial voice-input vocabulary for use directly providing electronic technical orders (TOs) within the VHIC system. Ultimately, the VHIC to the maintainer regardless of his location (Friend control suite is envisioned to be part of an & Grinstead, 1992; Kancler & Quill, 1997; interactive, wearable computer system for Masquelier, 1991;Revels, Quill, Kancler & presenting electronic TOs to USAF aircraft Masquelier, 1998;Webb, 1997). However, many maintainers (McMillan, Calhoun, Masquelier, maintenance activities require the use of both of the Grigsby, Quill, Kancler, Nemeth, & Revels, 1999).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determining Voice Strategies for Hands-Free Human-Computer Interaction

Revels

Kancler

Quill

et al. 2001

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Practitioner Paper examines a cost effective and efficient method to determine voice command strategies for hands-free controls when interacting with computer systems. Specifically, this method is applied to determining the combined use of voice commands and a head-tracking device as an alternative user interface for accessing digitized aircraft technical manuals. Aircraft maintainers from the Springfield, OH Air National Guard F-16 facility and the 445 th C-141 Air Force Reserve Unit served as subjects. User strategies appeared to follow onscreen interface characteristics and the user's experience level with computers.Generally, unlabeled icons and buttons elicited a point-and-click strategy, while labeled links elicited voiceonly commands. Users with increased familiarity with Windows-based interfaces were prone to a point-and-click strategy, while novices were likely to attempt various function oriented voice commands. Due to the observed user strategies, several issues were identified and a series of recommendations are presented which address the strategic application of a voice command vocabulary to a hands-free user interface. the voice-head integrated control (VHIC). The

show abstract

Ocular Dominance Effects on the Application of Monocular, Occluding Head-Mounted Displays

Cited by 5 publications

References 1 publication

Glasses Mounted Display Baseline Test: Comparing the GMD to Traditional Displays

Glasses Mounted Display Baseline Test: Comparing the GMD to Traditional Displays

<title>Human interaction with wearable computer systems: a look at glasses-mounted displays</title>

Determining Voice Strategies for Hands-Free Human-Computer Interaction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About