We describe a patient with Angelman syndrome with severe developmental delay who was visually impaired by uncorrected high hyperopia and poor control of accommodation. Refractive lens exchange with intraocular lens implantation was performed in both eyes when the patient was 22 years of age. Satisfactory anatomical and functional outcomes were achieved and maintained during 3 years of follow-up. Refractive lens exchange can be useful in patients with severe neurobehavioral disorders in the presence of high refractive error and poor accommodative control.Refractive surgery is now performed more frequently at a younger age in patients with severe anisometropia or bilateral high ametropia resistant to conventional therapy using spectacles or contact lenses.1 -4 Although corneal refractive surgery is less invasive than intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, it is not suitable for correcting extreme refractive errors. 4 In eyes with these errors, phakic IOL (pIOL) implantation or refractive lens exchange (RLE) with IOL implantation can be useful alternatives. In the United States, there are no Food and Drug Administration-approved pIOLs for hyperopic correction. We report the 3-year postoperative outcome of RLE with IOL implantation in both eyes of a patient with Angelman syndrome with severe developmental delay and uncorrected high hyperopia with poor accommodative control.
CASE REPORTIn 1992, a patient presented to us with a complaint about deviation of his eyes from his mother. The diagnosis was Angelman syndrome (Figure 1) with developmental delay, spontaneous laughter, excitability, hand flapping, and a short attention span. The vision was recorded as central and steady fixation in each eye. Refraction at the time of strabismus surgery for exotropia revealed marked hyperopia of +7.5 diopters (D) in both eyes. During a visit in 2006, the patient's mother stated that use of spectacles was becoming more and more difficult. Each new pair of glasses was broken by the patient despite attention from her and the caregivers. During the previous year, the mother had spent approximately $2500 on Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.Financial Disclosure: Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. .) was performed in the right eye, with a refractive aim of ā1.00 D. The posterior capsule was left intact in both eyes at the time of surgery. At the 3-year follow-up visit, the patient had central and steady fixation. Visually, the patient could manage his day-to-day activities. The mother noted a marked improvement in his q...