2006
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2006.22.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocular Hypotensive Effects of an Intratracheally Delivered Liposomal Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Preparation in Rats

Abstract: This study investigated the effect of an intratracheal (i.t.) administration of a liposome-entrapped Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (LTHC) preparation on intraocular pressure (IOP) in nonanaesthetized Brown Norway rats. The ocular hypotensive effects of i.t. LTHC were compared to that of intraperitoneal (i.p.) LTHC administration. All i.t. LTHC doses >0.05 mg/kg significantly decreased IOP (P < 0.05) within 30 min of administration, and doses of i.t. LTHC >0.1 mg/kg decreased IOP within 15 min of administration. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GAT229-induced increase in the duration of the IOP-lowering effect is in contrast to the relatively shortlived actions of acute orthosteric CB 1 activation by can-nabinoids, typically lasting only about 1-2 h after administration. [12][13][14]16,28,65,66 We found that whereas administration of 1% WIN alone reduced IOP for *1 h, the combination of subthreshold (0.25%) WIN with GAT229 reduced IOP for at least 6 h in normotensive mice. Duration of action is important when considering use as a clinically relevant therapeutic; drugs with short durations of action require frequent administration, which may lead to issues with patient compliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The GAT229-induced increase in the duration of the IOP-lowering effect is in contrast to the relatively shortlived actions of acute orthosteric CB 1 activation by can-nabinoids, typically lasting only about 1-2 h after administration. [12][13][14]16,28,65,66 We found that whereas administration of 1% WIN alone reduced IOP for *1 h, the combination of subthreshold (0.25%) WIN with GAT229 reduced IOP for at least 6 h in normotensive mice. Duration of action is important when considering use as a clinically relevant therapeutic; drugs with short durations of action require frequent administration, which may lead to issues with patient compliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…IOP is the primary risk factor for glaucoma, a blinding neurodegenerative eye disease, and drugs that reduce IOP, so-called ocular hypotensives, are used in the treatment of glaucoma. Although the IOP-lowering ability of cannabinoid agonists is well established (Hepler and Frank, 1971;Liu and Dacus, 1987;Chien et al, 2003;Szczesniak et al, 2006), none have been developed for the treatment of glaucoma, largely because of a limited understanding of the mechanisms by which cannabinoids produce their effect on IOP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of pharmacological and histological studies strongly suggest direct role of ocular CB1 receptors in the lowering of the IOP by the cannabinoids (1,2). Additionally, Δ 9 -THC has also been reported to reduce glutamate and N-methyl-Daspartate-induced retinal ganglionic cell death through its CB1 agonist activity (1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(8)(9). Moreover, the antioxidant property of Δ 9 -THC protects neurons against oxidative stress associated with glutamate-induced excitotoxicity (2,8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Δ 9 -THC has also been reported to reduce glutamate and N-methyl-Daspartate-induced retinal ganglionic cell death through its CB1 agonist activity (1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(8)(9). Moreover, the antioxidant property of Δ 9 -THC protects neurons against oxidative stress associated with glutamate-induced excitotoxicity (2,8,9). Therefore, in contrast to currently available drugs, topical administration of Δ 9 -THC would not only reduce the IOP but would also protect the retinal ganglionic cells against glutamate and N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced neurotoxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%