2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10762-019-00586-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocular Response to Millimeter Wave Exposure Under Different Levels of Humidity

Abstract: It is known that millimeter waves (MMW) are absorbed by surface tissue such as skin and the cornea. We previously demonstrated that MMW damages the eye by heat accumulation and transfer. To examine the influence of humidity on such damage, we investigated the difference in MMW-induced ocular tissue temperature increase under high (70%) and low (30%) relative humidity. Eyes of pigmented rabbits (Dutch, 11-15week old) were exposed unilaterally to 40-GHz 200 mW/cm 2 MMW for 5 or 30 min at the center of the pupill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was reported several decades ago that energy in the frequency range 10-300 GHz was absorbed by the skin surface and the surface tissue of eyeballs [1]. Studies have examined the effects to eyes of MMW exposure [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], but because their exposure methodology (especially, shape of antenna (radiation pattern of antenna) for MMW delivery) and experimental animals differed, the results of these studies cannot be directly compared. We have previously reported data on the threshold of eye injury in Dutch rabbits exposed to 40, 75, and 95 GHz MMW using uniform experimental procedures [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported several decades ago that energy in the frequency range 10-300 GHz was absorbed by the skin surface and the surface tissue of eyeballs [1]. Studies have examined the effects to eyes of MMW exposure [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], but because their exposure methodology (especially, shape of antenna (radiation pattern of antenna) for MMW delivery) and experimental animals differed, the results of these studies cannot be directly compared. We have previously reported data on the threshold of eye injury in Dutch rabbits exposed to 40, 75, and 95 GHz MMW using uniform experimental procedures [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the mentioned studies have addressed the ocular damage induced by RF radiation. However, as Kojima [ 26 ] pointed out, direct comparisons of the study results are not feasible due to variations in their exposure methods, such as the antenna’s shape (i.e., radiation pattern) for mmWave delivery and the use of different experimental animals. Consequently, more research is necessary, and exposure systems must be developed to replicate various studies involving different biological tissues to ensure the accuracy of the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comprehensive guide, outlining both advantages and limitations, serves as a valuable resource for scientists seeking to replicate exposure systems operating at higher frequencies. We aimed to facilitate further bioelectromagnetics research by conducting experiments, enabling direct comparisons with international studies in the field [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Additionally, our aim was to introduce a novel feature: a small radiation spot size specifically designed to study localised exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%