2013
DOI: 10.1186/1869-5760-3-32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocular tolerability and efficacy of intravitreal and subconjunctival injections of sirolimus in patients with non-infectious uveitis: primary 6-month results of the SAVE Study

Abstract: BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the ocular tolerability and efficacy of sirolimus administered as subconjunctival or intravitreal injections in patients with non-infectious uveitis. Sirolimus as a Therapeutic Approach for Uveitis (SAVE) is a prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study. Thirty patients were enrolled and randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either intravitreal injections of 352 μg sirolimus or subconjunctival injections of 1,320 μg at days 0, 60, and 120, with prim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NIU affects patients of different age groups and it may be chronic and recurrent (1). However, management of NIU is far more challenging than anterior uveitis which leads to irreversible vision loss/impairment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NIU affects patients of different age groups and it may be chronic and recurrent (1). However, management of NIU is far more challenging than anterior uveitis which leads to irreversible vision loss/impairment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapamycin, an immunosuppressant, may severely compromise immune function if administered through systemic route (22). To deliver rapamycin locally to the eye, various strategies such as route of administration (periocular, subconjunctival, intravitreal implants/injections), and formulations (nanoparticles, liposomes) based have been implemented (1,20,23). Strategies such as periocular, subconjunctival, and intravitreal implants/ injections of rapamycin are invasive and associated with side effects such as retinal detachment or damage, endophthalimitis, and pseudoendophthalmitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…87 The efficacy of sirolimus has been suggested on vitreous inflammation without significant difference between subconjonctival and intravitreal injections. 88 In case of ME related to inflammatory CNV, the longterm efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab has been reported by Mansour et al in a study of 81 patients with uveitis. 89 They have observed a significant increase in VA in patients with histoplasmosis, multifocal choroiditis, punctate inner chorioretinopthy and toxoplasmosis, as well as a significant decrease in foveal thickness in the overall patient group.…”
Section: Benefits Of Intravitreal Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…17 Due to all the above information, the necessity and choice of potential local and systemic immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory therapy for RPC allotransplantation remain an open question with several options available. 18 In the current allograft study, we evaluated the effect on survival and engraftment of a single intravitreal injection of rapamycin (sirolimus) 19 and dexamethasone 20 from several local regimens that have been tested previously: fujimycin (tacrolimus), 21 triamcinolone, 22 cyclosporine, 23 and amethopterin (methotrexate). 24 Cyclosporine A and other calcineurin inhibitors prevent the subsequent activation of T-cells by reducing interleukin (IL)-2 production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%