CVICerebral visual impairment RTF Reaction time to fixation GFA Gaze fixation area SRT Saccade reaction times AIM The aim of this study was to compare visually guided ocular motor behaviour in children with visual processing and ⁄ or motor deficits with an age-matched comparison group and an adult group.METHOD Visual stimuli were shown to 28 children with visual processing and ⁄ or motor deficits (11 females, 17 males; mean age 7y 5mo, SD 2y 9mo, range 2-14y;) and an age-matched comparison group of 213 typically developing children (115 females, 98 males; mean age 5y 8mo, SD 3y 5mo, range 0-12y). The adult group consisted of nine females and two males with (mean age of 24y 4mo, SD 4y 8mo). Individuals who had a likely diagnosis of cerebral visual impairment (CVI), an opticopathy with unknown location, nystagmus, glaucoma, or a cataract were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were a visual acuity below 0.2, a developmental age under 1 year, and the presence of brain tumours, autism, and anxiety disorders. Orientating eye movements to large cartoons were quantified using the reaction time to fixation (RTF) and gaze fixation area (GFA). A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between groups and Bonferroni post-hoc testing was used to analyse age dependence of RTF and GFA values within the comparison group.RESULTS Individuals with CVI showed significantly prolonged RTF values; those with congenital nystagmus showed significantly increased GFA values. In the comparison group, RTF was significantly longer in children under the age of 2 years than in children aged 4 years and older (290 and 200ms respectively; p<0.001). No developmental change was found for GFA values.
INTERPRETATIONIncreased RTF values in individuals with CVI relate to visual processing deficits.The data suggest that visually guided ocular motor responses mature during the first 3 years of life.Early human development involves the maturation of complex interactions between cortical networks that are specialized for target selection (visual system), motor preparation (premotor system), and generation of eye movements (ocular motor system).1,2 Recently, two areas have been described that act as attention networks: a dorsal frontoparietal network and a ventral frontoparietal network.3 It is proposed that the dorsal stream enables the selection of goal-driven (voluntary) attention, whereas the ventral stream detects stimulus-driven (reflexive) attention.3 Activation in the dorsal premotor region, the frontal eye field, and the superior parietal cortex was shown during voluntary or reflexive shifts of attention. This suggests not only involvement of multiple brain areas but also dynamic interaction between the cortical attention networks.