“…Furthermore, since (15) holds and ϕ m,p (t) is a nontrivial solution of the null Dirichlet problem associated with equation ( 17), we obtain as a direct consequence of Theorem 3.1 in [2] that there exist δ m,p > 0 and a unique smooth function ∆ m,p (δ) defined on [0, δ m,p [ such that ∆ m,p (0) = v N and Φ m,p (t, δ) := x(t, ∆ m,p (δ), δ) for δ ∈ [0, δ m,p [ is a nontrivial solution of the corresponding null Dirichlet problem associated with (16) that emanates from ϕ m,p (t). Here x(t, v, δ) denotes the general solution of (16),i.e., x(0, v, δ) = 0, ẋ(0, v, δ) = v. Moreover, because of the uniqueness of the branch given above by the Implicit Function Theorem, we have that for δ > 0 small enough Φ m,p (t, δ) ≡ x m,N (t), where x m,N (t) ≡ x(t, ωm,N , δ) is the solution of (16) given by Proposition 2.8 in the former section.…”