ODDMS: Online Distributed Dynamic Meeting Scheduler

Nigam, Archana; Srivastava, Sanjay

doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0630-7_19

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A systematic assessment system allows students to respond more quickly to gaps in knowledge, as well as to make changes to the learning schedule (Lapshina et al, 2020). To facilitate the distance learning process, Nigam and Srivastava (2020) developed an interactive online planner that facilitates the development of learning schedules. However, in this article, we turned to iStudiez pro as a springboard for scheduling student work time since this scheduler has proven its effectiveness in a low workload environment and simplifies working with large amounts of information.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rigid class scheduling and its value for online learning in higher education

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The spread of coronavirus infection brings changes to all spheres of activity, including education, which is increasingly moving to a distance learning format. The ultimate goal of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the recommendations for developing a rigid class scheduling method in the framework of online learning using advanced approaches updating traditional learning mechanisms. Overall, this research was conducted among 226 students and 54 teachers representing Moscow Aviation Institute and Kazan Federal University. Research methodology basis was represented by a sociological survey, which allowed identifying the problems of implementation of online learning from the students' standpoint. The collected outcomes showed that for 35% of students, one of the main problems in distance learning was the lack of self-discipline, which can be further adjusted by a clearly established schedule of classes (37% of respondents) and tests (29% of respondents). At the same time, the collected data showed that the learning process was most efficient in subgroups 1 (0.5), 2 (0.3), and 5 (0.45). Recommendations provided for further distance education improvement, first of all, related to schedule formation issues. More precisely, the paper emphasized the need for time constraints, even distribution of subjects, use of special applications, designation of dates for knowledge checking, and inclusion of additional learning materials. The findings and results of this work are believed to be of scientific value for the methodological departments of educational institutions responsible for curricula preparation as they are expected to significantly contribute to educational process advancement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%