2018
DOI: 10.7554/elife.39681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Odor-evoked category reactivation in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex during sleep promotes memory consolidation

Abstract: Slow-wave sleep is an optimal opportunity for memory consolidation: when encoding occurs in the presence of a sensory cue, delivery of that cue during sleep enhances retrieval of associated memories. Recent studies suggest that cues might promote consolidation by inducing neural reinstatement of cue-associated content during sleep, but direct evidence for such mechanisms is scant, and the relevant brain areas supporting these processes are poorly understood. Here, we address these gaps by combining a novel olf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
12
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, it is unclear how the dominant trisynaptic circuit within the hippocampus could exhibit patterns of activity that could support item-specific reinstatement as measured by fMRI. Further, previous findings are mixed [29], with some fMRI studies failing to find evidence for item- [4,5] or category-level [30] reinstatement within the hippocampus and other studies finding evidence for item-level [31] or category-level [32] reinstatement. We used left and right hippocampus as ROIs for the same reinstatement analysis described above, and found no evidence of significant reinstatement for either control-stimulation (p's > 0.063) or HNT-stimulation sessions (p's > 0.183), and no difference in reinstatement between stimulation sessions (p's > 0.110).…”
Section: Effects Of Stimulation On Reinstatementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, it is unclear how the dominant trisynaptic circuit within the hippocampus could exhibit patterns of activity that could support item-specific reinstatement as measured by fMRI. Further, previous findings are mixed [29], with some fMRI studies failing to find evidence for item- [4,5] or category-level [30] reinstatement within the hippocampus and other studies finding evidence for item-level [31] or category-level [32] reinstatement. We used left and right hippocampus as ROIs for the same reinstatement analysis described above, and found no evidence of significant reinstatement for either control-stimulation (p's > 0.063) or HNT-stimulation sessions (p's > 0.183), and no difference in reinstatement between stimulation sessions (p's > 0.110).…”
Section: Effects Of Stimulation On Reinstatementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they found that the presence of sleep spindles, brief (0.5-3 s) bursts of 11-16 Hz oscillatory brain activity during NREM sleep that frequently correlate with memory retention (Antony and Paller, 2017) overlapped with time intervals when this decoding was possible. Similarly, Shanahan et al (2018) showed decoding of TMR-evoked category information using fMRI. Finally, multivariate features from EEG activity after TMR cues could be used to successfully decode different parts of a procedural memory sequence (Belal et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This can be achieved by presenting sounds or smells that were previously linked to items learned in wake during subsequent sleep. TMR has been shown to trigger memory reactivation (Belal et al, 2018; Schreiner et al, 2018; Shanahan et al, 2018) and to influence memory performance after sleep, for example by improving episodic (Rasch et al, 2007; Rudoy et al, 2009; Cellini and Cappuzo, 2018) and procedural skill consolidation (Antony et al, 2012; Schönauer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%